KEKERASAN SEBAGAI SUMBER DAYA GAM PASCA KONFLIK (Studi Tentang Keberlangsungan Kekerasan Mantan Kombatan GAM pasca MoU Helsinki Hingga Pemilu Legislatif 2009 di Kabupaten Aceh Utara, Kabupaten Bireuen, dan Kota Lhokseumawe).

• Main Authors: , Adri Patria, , Bapak Prof. Dr. Purwo Santoso, MA
• Format: Theses and Dissertations NonPeerReviewed
• Published: [Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada 2012
• Subjects: ETD
• Online Access: https://repository.ugm.ac.id/118101/; http://etd.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=PenelitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=56927
• Institution: Universitas Gadjah Mada

In the MoU, Gerakan Aceh Merdeka (GAM) agreed with the peace with weapons disarmament and destruction owned by combatants, dissolution of GAM organization, and implementation of reintegration programs. But ironically, amid efforts of post-conflict democratization is still flourishing violent acts carried out by combatants former, although not as frontal conflict. The problems studied are: why is the violence of combatants former still held the post of peace? Research on this is very important given the context of combatants former is a key actor in the Aceh peace. The core issues will be answered and analyzed using the analytical framework of conflict transformation and path dependence, especially self-reinforcing sequence to analyze why the violence conducted by combatants former remain occurred after the MoU by using three explanatory framework, that is analysis of power, functions, and legitimacy. A qualitative approach was chosen as the research methods to obtain data in connection with a research focus in this study. The reintegration program is actually a standing point of peace was only focusing on the economic context and indifferent to the political context, did not go well. The amount of disregard for the problems that occur on the combatants former after the peace is a diversification of the Aceh conflict settlement issue permanently. It is suspected to trigger a series of acts of violence. Democratization is so difficult to implement due to the violent behavior of combatants former without many people realizing the political setting that escaped from the various studies. The lack of legitimacy of new GAM organization in postconflict that known as Komite Peralihan Aceh (KPA) triggered the violence by combatants former in Aceh, particularly in this study site. The indications are: (1) KPA is a reincarnation of AGAM/TNA which has an organizational structure with same operations to protect the interests of KPA elite. This led to the distribution of power actors of combatants former into every organizational structure starting from the provincial to village level (gampong), (2) such wide distribution of power makes the system so functional to protect the interests of KPA in each work area to drive combatants former to perform acts of violence, either xvi systematically or personally, and (3) violence by combatants former will help enhance the legitimacy of KPA which as the only effective political resource now and also to show of violence as as their political resources, as indicated by the strong support�due to power mobilization of combatants former that tends to violence-dimensional�to KPA actors in various events of political competition. But to run into election 2009, KPA is not possible to be political vehicle since KPA is an organization "without a face", thus stimulating both elites GAM combatants and non-combatants to initiate a political vehicle that called Partai Aceh to accommodate all Acehnese to join with KPA as the motor of support mobilization