Modeling Soil-Landscape Relationships

Soil-landscape model represents both relationships between soil and landform and the relationships between the pattern of soil-landform relationship and processes of pedogeomorphic evolution. This paper aims to get insight about soil-landscape relationships as a basis for soil-landscape modeling wit...

全面介紹

Saved in:
書目詳細資料
主要作者: Perpustakaan UGM, i-lib
格式: Article NonPeerReviewed
出版: [Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada 2005
主題:
在線閱讀:https://repository.ugm.ac.id/27265/
http://i-lib.ugm.ac.id/jurnal/download.php?dataId=10317
標簽: 添加標簽
沒有標簽, 成為第一個標記此記錄!
id id-ugm-repo.27265
record_format dspace
spelling id-ugm-repo.272652014-06-18T00:26:59Z https://repository.ugm.ac.id/27265/ Modeling Soil-Landscape Relationships Perpustakaan UGM, i-lib Jurnal i-lib UGM Soil-landscape model represents both relationships between soil and landform and the relationships between the pattern of soil-landform relationship and processes of pedogeomorphic evolution. This paper aims to get insight about soil-landscape relationships as a basis for soil-landscape modeling with giving emphasis on the methodology and the review of the modeling result of research from developed countries since the advent of GIS. The modeling follows four consecutive stages: physiographic domain characterization, geomorphometric characterization of the landscape, horizon stratigraphy characterization and soil property characterization. Landscape position determines soil profile properties and horizon properties. At lar~e scale, slope, flow accumulation, and CTI are best predictors for A-horizon depth (R = 0.85), whereas CTI alone accounts for 71 % of variance. Flow accumulation and upslope mean profile curvature are best predictors for soil depth (R2= 0.88), whereas CTI alone accounts for 84 % of variance. Slope and flow accumulation are best predictor for carbon content (R2 = 0.80), and CTI accounts for 78 % of variance. A tree with five terminal nodes was optimal for predicting soil profile depth with slope, CTI, relative elevation, and temperature as predictors. A tree with five terminal nodes was optimal for predicting total soil phosphorus with radiometric potassium, relief, downslope gradient, and plan curvature as predictors. At intermediate to small scale, gilgai and landform are best ~redictor for clay content (R2 = 0.51). Gilgai is best predictor for prediction of EC (R =0.364), and landform is best predictor for ESP (R2=0.561). A tree with six terminal nods was optimal for predicting depth of A horizon of tuff soil in Lampung Province, Indonesia with average slope and elevation as predictors. Modeling has increasingly developed mainly due to the advance of computer technology both software and hardware. Generalized linear model and tree-based model can be used to develop quantitative soil-landscape relationship Keyword: Soil-landscape relationship, modeling, regression tree, environmental correlation, Lampung [Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada 2005 Article NonPeerReviewed Perpustakaan UGM, i-lib (2005) Modeling Soil-Landscape Relationships. Jurnal i-lib UGM. http://i-lib.ugm.ac.id/jurnal/download.php?dataId=10317
institution Universitas Gadjah Mada
building UGM Library
country Indonesia
collection Repository Civitas UGM
topic Jurnal i-lib UGM
spellingShingle Jurnal i-lib UGM
Perpustakaan UGM, i-lib
Modeling Soil-Landscape Relationships
description Soil-landscape model represents both relationships between soil and landform and the relationships between the pattern of soil-landform relationship and processes of pedogeomorphic evolution. This paper aims to get insight about soil-landscape relationships as a basis for soil-landscape modeling with giving emphasis on the methodology and the review of the modeling result of research from developed countries since the advent of GIS. The modeling follows four consecutive stages: physiographic domain characterization, geomorphometric characterization of the landscape, horizon stratigraphy characterization and soil property characterization. Landscape position determines soil profile properties and horizon properties. At lar~e scale, slope, flow accumulation, and CTI are best predictors for A-horizon depth (R = 0.85), whereas CTI alone accounts for 71 % of variance. Flow accumulation and upslope mean profile curvature are best predictors for soil depth (R2= 0.88), whereas CTI alone accounts for 84 % of variance. Slope and flow accumulation are best predictor for carbon content (R2 = 0.80), and CTI accounts for 78 % of variance. A tree with five terminal nodes was optimal for predicting soil profile depth with slope, CTI, relative elevation, and temperature as predictors. A tree with five terminal nodes was optimal for predicting total soil phosphorus with radiometric potassium, relief, downslope gradient, and plan curvature as predictors. At intermediate to small scale, gilgai and landform are best ~redictor for clay content (R2 = 0.51). Gilgai is best predictor for prediction of EC (R =0.364), and landform is best predictor for ESP (R2=0.561). A tree with six terminal nods was optimal for predicting depth of A horizon of tuff soil in Lampung Province, Indonesia with average slope and elevation as predictors. Modeling has increasingly developed mainly due to the advance of computer technology both software and hardware. Generalized linear model and tree-based model can be used to develop quantitative soil-landscape relationship Keyword: Soil-landscape relationship, modeling, regression tree, environmental correlation, Lampung
format Article
NonPeerReviewed
author Perpustakaan UGM, i-lib
author_facet Perpustakaan UGM, i-lib
author_sort Perpustakaan UGM, i-lib
title Modeling Soil-Landscape Relationships
title_short Modeling Soil-Landscape Relationships
title_full Modeling Soil-Landscape Relationships
title_fullStr Modeling Soil-Landscape Relationships
title_full_unstemmed Modeling Soil-Landscape Relationships
title_sort modeling soil-landscape relationships
publisher [Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada
publishDate 2005
url https://repository.ugm.ac.id/27265/
http://i-lib.ugm.ac.id/jurnal/download.php?dataId=10317
_version_ 1681218927488663552