Indonesia constitutional court: the guardians of democracy in the pandemic era
General elections, which are carried out honestly, fairly, consistently and continuously, are efforts to maintain a democratic climate in every country. As a country that upholds democracy, Indonesia always strives to carry out general elections in an honest, fair, consistent and continuous manner...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2022
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://irep.iium.edu.my/102532/13/102532_Indonesia%20constitutional%20court%20the%20guardians.pdf http://irep.iium.edu.my/102532/ https://www.crelda.org/_files/ugd/8211f0_4745be6e69c548c2b96250187086ab2a.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Universiti Islam Antarabangsa Malaysia |
Language: | English |
Summary: | General elections, which are carried out honestly, fairly, consistently and continuously, are efforts to maintain a democratic climate in every country. As a country that upholds democracy,
Indonesia always strives to carry out general elections in an honest, fair, consistent and continuous manner every five years, as mandated by the constitution. In spite of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, Indonesia had conducted regional head elections, namely
the election of governors in 9 provinces and of regents/mayors in 261 districts/cities. As the state
institution guards the constitution and democracy, the Constitutional Court is obliged to resolve
and manage general election disputes even during the pandemic. This paper examines the
strategy and management of the Constitutional Court in handling general election dispute cases
to regions during the pandemic period while maintaining the independence and impartiality of
the Constitutional Court institutions. This study uses primary and secondary data, including the
Indonesian Constitution, the regional election law, and other regulations related to handling
regional head elections during a pandemic. This study also compares government policies related
to handling regional head elections during a pandemic in Indonesia and other countries,
especially regarding the rights of the people to still be able to come to Court during a pandemic.
Existing data and legal materials related to handling general election disputes during a pandemic
are compared and analysed in full and in detail. It is concluded that the management of case
admissions and trial management using ICT technology has proven to be effective in minimising
the gathering of people so that the Constitutional Court does not become a cluster of coronavirus
transmission. |
---|