Metadiscourse in the academic writing of local and international students at a university in Malaysia
This study examines the use of metadiscourse markers among 50 Malaysian and 50 Arab Pre-University students. The findings of this study indicated that there was a significant difference in the use of metadiscourse markers between Malaysian and Arab Pre-University students {χ2 (1, n = 100) = 7.17,...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English English |
Published: |
Conscientia Beam
2018
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://irep.iium.edu.my/70476/1/IJEP-2018-metadiscourse.pdf http://irep.iium.edu.my/70476/7/70476_Metadiscourse%20in%20the%20academic%20writing_scopus.pdf http://irep.iium.edu.my/70476/ http://www.conscientiabeam.com/pdf-files/art/61/IJEP-2018-6(4)-227-238.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Universiti Islam Antarabangsa Malaysia |
Language: | English English |
Summary: | This study examines the use of metadiscourse markers among 50 Malaysian and 50
Arab Pre-University students. The findings of this study indicated that there was a
significant difference in the use of metadiscourse markers between Malaysian and Arab
Pre-University students {χ2 (1, n = 100) = 7.17, p-value is .007} where the use of
metadiscourse markers among Malaysian Pre-University students was substantially
higher than that of the Arab Pre-University students. In the use of interactive markers,
the results showed significant differences between Malaysian and Arab Pre-University
students in the use of transitions, evidential and code glosses. Additionally, in the use of
interactional markers, Malaysian and Arab students differed in their use of hedges,
engagement markers and self-mentions. These variances in the frequency and forms of
metadiscourse markers utilized by the students could be attributed to the diverse
cultural backgrounds of the two groups of students. It is therefore suggested that
English language teachers integrate and incorporate cultural elements in their lessons
with regard to metadiscourse markers. |
---|