Metadiscourse in the academic writing of local and international students at a university in Malaysia

This study examines the use of metadiscourse markers among 50 Malaysian and 50 Arab Pre-University students. The findings of this study indicated that there was a significant difference in the use of metadiscourse markers between Malaysian and Arab Pre-University students {χ2 (1, n = 100) = 7.17,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zakaria, Muhamad Khairul, Abdul Malik, Faridah, Ab. Rashid, Radzuwan, Pilus, Zahariah, Zakaria, Nur Shahida
Format: Article
Language:English
English
Published: Conscientia Beam 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:http://irep.iium.edu.my/70476/1/IJEP-2018-metadiscourse.pdf
http://irep.iium.edu.my/70476/7/70476_Metadiscourse%20in%20the%20academic%20writing_scopus.pdf
http://irep.iium.edu.my/70476/
http://www.conscientiabeam.com/pdf-files/art/61/IJEP-2018-6(4)-227-238.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Universiti Islam Antarabangsa Malaysia
Language: English
English
id my.iium.irep.70476
record_format dspace
spelling my.iium.irep.704762020-05-15T05:30:33Z http://irep.iium.edu.my/70476/ Metadiscourse in the academic writing of local and international students at a university in Malaysia Zakaria, Muhamad Khairul Abdul Malik, Faridah Ab. Rashid, Radzuwan Pilus, Zahariah Zakaria, Nur Shahida PE English This study examines the use of metadiscourse markers among 50 Malaysian and 50 Arab Pre-University students. The findings of this study indicated that there was a significant difference in the use of metadiscourse markers between Malaysian and Arab Pre-University students {χ2 (1, n = 100) = 7.17, p-value is .007} where the use of metadiscourse markers among Malaysian Pre-University students was substantially higher than that of the Arab Pre-University students. In the use of interactive markers, the results showed significant differences between Malaysian and Arab Pre-University students in the use of transitions, evidential and code glosses. Additionally, in the use of interactional markers, Malaysian and Arab students differed in their use of hedges, engagement markers and self-mentions. These variances in the frequency and forms of metadiscourse markers utilized by the students could be attributed to the diverse cultural backgrounds of the two groups of students. It is therefore suggested that English language teachers integrate and incorporate cultural elements in their lessons with regard to metadiscourse markers. Conscientia Beam 2018 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/70476/1/IJEP-2018-metadiscourse.pdf application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/70476/7/70476_Metadiscourse%20in%20the%20academic%20writing_scopus.pdf Zakaria, Muhamad Khairul and Abdul Malik, Faridah and Ab. Rashid, Radzuwan and Pilus, Zahariah and Zakaria, Nur Shahida (2018) Metadiscourse in the academic writing of local and international students at a university in Malaysia. International Journal of Education and Practice, 6 (4). pp. 227-238. ISSN 2311-6897 http://www.conscientiabeam.com/pdf-files/art/61/IJEP-2018-6(4)-227-238.pdf 10.18488/journal.61.2018.64.227.238
institution Universiti Islam Antarabangsa Malaysia
building IIUM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider International Islamic University Malaysia
content_source IIUM Repository (IREP)
url_provider http://irep.iium.edu.my/
language English
English
topic PE English
spellingShingle PE English
Zakaria, Muhamad Khairul
Abdul Malik, Faridah
Ab. Rashid, Radzuwan
Pilus, Zahariah
Zakaria, Nur Shahida
Metadiscourse in the academic writing of local and international students at a university in Malaysia
description This study examines the use of metadiscourse markers among 50 Malaysian and 50 Arab Pre-University students. The findings of this study indicated that there was a significant difference in the use of metadiscourse markers between Malaysian and Arab Pre-University students {χ2 (1, n = 100) = 7.17, p-value is .007} where the use of metadiscourse markers among Malaysian Pre-University students was substantially higher than that of the Arab Pre-University students. In the use of interactive markers, the results showed significant differences between Malaysian and Arab Pre-University students in the use of transitions, evidential and code glosses. Additionally, in the use of interactional markers, Malaysian and Arab students differed in their use of hedges, engagement markers and self-mentions. These variances in the frequency and forms of metadiscourse markers utilized by the students could be attributed to the diverse cultural backgrounds of the two groups of students. It is therefore suggested that English language teachers integrate and incorporate cultural elements in their lessons with regard to metadiscourse markers.
format Article
author Zakaria, Muhamad Khairul
Abdul Malik, Faridah
Ab. Rashid, Radzuwan
Pilus, Zahariah
Zakaria, Nur Shahida
author_facet Zakaria, Muhamad Khairul
Abdul Malik, Faridah
Ab. Rashid, Radzuwan
Pilus, Zahariah
Zakaria, Nur Shahida
author_sort Zakaria, Muhamad Khairul
title Metadiscourse in the academic writing of local and international students at a university in Malaysia
title_short Metadiscourse in the academic writing of local and international students at a university in Malaysia
title_full Metadiscourse in the academic writing of local and international students at a university in Malaysia
title_fullStr Metadiscourse in the academic writing of local and international students at a university in Malaysia
title_full_unstemmed Metadiscourse in the academic writing of local and international students at a university in Malaysia
title_sort metadiscourse in the academic writing of local and international students at a university in malaysia
publisher Conscientia Beam
publishDate 2018
url http://irep.iium.edu.my/70476/1/IJEP-2018-metadiscourse.pdf
http://irep.iium.edu.my/70476/7/70476_Metadiscourse%20in%20the%20academic%20writing_scopus.pdf
http://irep.iium.edu.my/70476/
http://www.conscientiabeam.com/pdf-files/art/61/IJEP-2018-6(4)-227-238.pdf
_version_ 1669007546627653632