Pre-university students' strategies in revising ESL writing using teacher's written corrective feedback / Khairil Azwar Razali

In Flower-Hayes (1981) Cognitive Process Theory of Writing reviewing stage, writers would evaluate and make revision to the essays. Hyland (1998) outlined four strategies used by student in revising their essays, i.e. closely follow, initial stimulus, avoidance by deletion and not related. The objec...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Razali, Khairil Azwar
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/14092/1/TM_KHAIRIL%20AZWAR%20RAZALI%20ED%2014_5.pdf
http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/14092/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Universiti Teknologi Mara
Language: English
id my.uitm.ir.14092
record_format eprints
spelling my.uitm.ir.140922016-06-23T02:39:07Z http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/14092/ Pre-university students' strategies in revising ESL writing using teacher's written corrective feedback / Khairil Azwar Razali Razali, Khairil Azwar Report writing. Research Lectures and lecturing Educational tests, measurements, evaluations and examinations Study and teaching In Flower-Hayes (1981) Cognitive Process Theory of Writing reviewing stage, writers would evaluate and make revision to the essays. Hyland (1998) outlined four strategies used by student in revising their essays, i.e. closely follow, initial stimulus, avoidance by deletion and not related. The objectives of this study are to find out the most common strategy used by the students, and further to determine which strategy is considered as successful. A qualitative approach has been used in this study where data are collected from the analysis of students' opinion-based essays and retrospective interviews. From the study, the most common strategy used is closely follow because students believe that they need to make sure the revised essays are error-free. The result also shows that the same strategy is considered as successful as many of the revised WCF are error-free. The results implies that even though students may successfully revise the essay, they may not necessarily understand the nature of the errors committed. It is recommended that teachers provide written corrective feedback with oral feedback and this should be done while students are writing the essay, in line with Flower-Hayes Cognitive Process Theory of Writing. 2014 Thesis NonPeerReviewed text en http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/14092/1/TM_KHAIRIL%20AZWAR%20RAZALI%20ED%2014_5.pdf Razali, Khairil Azwar (2014) Pre-university students' strategies in revising ESL writing using teacher's written corrective feedback / Khairil Azwar Razali. Masters thesis, Universiti Teknologi MARA.
institution Universiti Teknologi Mara
building Tun Abdul Razak Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Mara
content_source UiTM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://ir.uitm.edu.my/
language English
topic Report writing. Research
Lectures and lecturing
Educational tests, measurements, evaluations and examinations
Study and teaching
spellingShingle Report writing. Research
Lectures and lecturing
Educational tests, measurements, evaluations and examinations
Study and teaching
Razali, Khairil Azwar
Pre-university students' strategies in revising ESL writing using teacher's written corrective feedback / Khairil Azwar Razali
description In Flower-Hayes (1981) Cognitive Process Theory of Writing reviewing stage, writers would evaluate and make revision to the essays. Hyland (1998) outlined four strategies used by student in revising their essays, i.e. closely follow, initial stimulus, avoidance by deletion and not related. The objectives of this study are to find out the most common strategy used by the students, and further to determine which strategy is considered as successful. A qualitative approach has been used in this study where data are collected from the analysis of students' opinion-based essays and retrospective interviews. From the study, the most common strategy used is closely follow because students believe that they need to make sure the revised essays are error-free. The result also shows that the same strategy is considered as successful as many of the revised WCF are error-free. The results implies that even though students may successfully revise the essay, they may not necessarily understand the nature of the errors committed. It is recommended that teachers provide written corrective feedback with oral feedback and this should be done while students are writing the essay, in line with Flower-Hayes Cognitive Process Theory of Writing.
format Thesis
author Razali, Khairil Azwar
author_facet Razali, Khairil Azwar
author_sort Razali, Khairil Azwar
title Pre-university students' strategies in revising ESL writing using teacher's written corrective feedback / Khairil Azwar Razali
title_short Pre-university students' strategies in revising ESL writing using teacher's written corrective feedback / Khairil Azwar Razali
title_full Pre-university students' strategies in revising ESL writing using teacher's written corrective feedback / Khairil Azwar Razali
title_fullStr Pre-university students' strategies in revising ESL writing using teacher's written corrective feedback / Khairil Azwar Razali
title_full_unstemmed Pre-university students' strategies in revising ESL writing using teacher's written corrective feedback / Khairil Azwar Razali
title_sort pre-university students' strategies in revising esl writing using teacher's written corrective feedback / khairil azwar razali
publishDate 2014
url http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/14092/1/TM_KHAIRIL%20AZWAR%20RAZALI%20ED%2014_5.pdf
http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/14092/
_version_ 1685648470502801408