Detail reproduction of elastomeric materials: effect of viscosity and groove geometry / Nik Zarina Nik Mahmood … [et al.]

Objective: To evaluate the effect of type of viscosity and groove on surface detail reproduction of elastomeric impression materials. Methods: Two polyvinylsiloxane and polyether elastomeric impression materials were investigated. An aluminium cylindrical reference block with V- and U-shaped grooves...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Nik Mahmood, Nik Zarina
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Faculty of Dentistry 2015
Online Access:http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/18387/2/AJ_NIK%20ZARINA%20NIK%20MAHMOOD%20COS%2015.pdf
http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/18387/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Universiti Teknologi Mara
Language: English
id my.uitm.ir.18387
record_format eprints
spelling my.uitm.ir.183872019-07-03T07:13:07Z http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/18387/ Detail reproduction of elastomeric materials: effect of viscosity and groove geometry / Nik Zarina Nik Mahmood … [et al.] Nik Mahmood, Nik Zarina Objective: To evaluate the effect of type of viscosity and groove on surface detail reproduction of elastomeric impression materials. Methods: Two polyvinylsiloxane and polyether elastomeric impression materials were investigated. An aluminium cylindrical reference block with V- and U-shaped grooves of 1 mm and 2 mm in depth was machined using CAD-CAM system. Impressions of the block were taken to produce 35 master dies. Each die was immersed in distilled water for 5 minutes prior to impression making. Surface topography of the dies and impressions were captured using Alicona Imaging System. Mean difference in depth between the master dies and corresponding impressions' grooves were analyzed. Results: Type of viscosities and groove showed significant main effects on surface detail (p < .01), but no significant interaction was observed between the two (p > .01). Express™ putty/light exhibited the lowest mean difference in depth for all grooves. The highest mean difference for U₁ (38.3|jm ± 21.55), U₂ (52.96pm ± 30.39)^ (45.02pm ± 34.82) and V₂ (58.44pm ± 44.19) was obtained from Impregum medium, Aquasil medium, Impregum™ heavy/light and Impregum™ heavy/light groups respectively. Conclusion: Express putty/light-bodied material produced the best surface detail, and Ushaped groove showed superior detail reproduction. Faculty of Dentistry 2015 Article PeerReviewed text en http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/18387/2/AJ_NIK%20ZARINA%20NIK%20MAHMOOD%20COS%2015.pdf Nik Mahmood, Nik Zarina (2015) Detail reproduction of elastomeric materials: effect of viscosity and groove geometry / Nik Zarina Nik Mahmood … [et al.]. Compendium of Oral Science (Compend. Oral Sci.), 1. pp. 21-31. ISSN 2489-1102
institution Universiti Teknologi Mara
building Tun Abdul Razak Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Mara
content_source UiTM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://ir.uitm.edu.my/
language English
description Objective: To evaluate the effect of type of viscosity and groove on surface detail reproduction of elastomeric impression materials. Methods: Two polyvinylsiloxane and polyether elastomeric impression materials were investigated. An aluminium cylindrical reference block with V- and U-shaped grooves of 1 mm and 2 mm in depth was machined using CAD-CAM system. Impressions of the block were taken to produce 35 master dies. Each die was immersed in distilled water for 5 minutes prior to impression making. Surface topography of the dies and impressions were captured using Alicona Imaging System. Mean difference in depth between the master dies and corresponding impressions' grooves were analyzed. Results: Type of viscosities and groove showed significant main effects on surface detail (p < .01), but no significant interaction was observed between the two (p > .01). Express™ putty/light exhibited the lowest mean difference in depth for all grooves. The highest mean difference for U₁ (38.3|jm ± 21.55), U₂ (52.96pm ± 30.39)^ (45.02pm ± 34.82) and V₂ (58.44pm ± 44.19) was obtained from Impregum medium, Aquasil medium, Impregum™ heavy/light and Impregum™ heavy/light groups respectively. Conclusion: Express putty/light-bodied material produced the best surface detail, and Ushaped groove showed superior detail reproduction.
format Article
author Nik Mahmood, Nik Zarina
spellingShingle Nik Mahmood, Nik Zarina
Detail reproduction of elastomeric materials: effect of viscosity and groove geometry / Nik Zarina Nik Mahmood … [et al.]
author_facet Nik Mahmood, Nik Zarina
author_sort Nik Mahmood, Nik Zarina
title Detail reproduction of elastomeric materials: effect of viscosity and groove geometry / Nik Zarina Nik Mahmood … [et al.]
title_short Detail reproduction of elastomeric materials: effect of viscosity and groove geometry / Nik Zarina Nik Mahmood … [et al.]
title_full Detail reproduction of elastomeric materials: effect of viscosity and groove geometry / Nik Zarina Nik Mahmood … [et al.]
title_fullStr Detail reproduction of elastomeric materials: effect of viscosity and groove geometry / Nik Zarina Nik Mahmood … [et al.]
title_full_unstemmed Detail reproduction of elastomeric materials: effect of viscosity and groove geometry / Nik Zarina Nik Mahmood … [et al.]
title_sort detail reproduction of elastomeric materials: effect of viscosity and groove geometry / nik zarina nik mahmood … [et al.]
publisher Faculty of Dentistry
publishDate 2015
url http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/18387/2/AJ_NIK%20ZARINA%20NIK%20MAHMOOD%20COS%2015.pdf
http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/18387/
_version_ 1685649076203290624