The effectiveness of handout assisted versus verbal consent on post-operative recall and understanding-A randomized control study

Background: Consent is an important component of surgical care. Poorly attempted consent bears significant ethical and legal implications. We assessed the effectiveness of handouts in improving postoperative consent understanding and recall compared to standard verbal consent during laparoscopic cho...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Koong, Jun Kit, Rajandram, Retnagowri, Sidambram, Naveendran, Narayanan, Vairavan
Format: Article
Published: ROYAL COLLEGE SURGEONS EDINBURGH 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.um.edu.my/42180/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Universiti Malaya
id my.um.eprints.42180
record_format eprints
spelling my.um.eprints.421802023-10-16T02:22:09Z http://eprints.um.edu.my/42180/ The effectiveness of handout assisted versus verbal consent on post-operative recall and understanding-A randomized control study Koong, Jun Kit Rajandram, Retnagowri Sidambram, Naveendran Narayanan, Vairavan RD Surgery Background: Consent is an important component of surgical care. Poorly attempted consent bears significant ethical and legal implications. We assessed the effectiveness of handouts in improving postoperative consent understanding and recall compared to standard verbal consent during laparoscopic cholecystectomy as a tool that may improve information retention and leads to better treatment satisfaction. Methods: This is a prospective block randomized, non-blinded study conducted at a single tertiary hospital. Patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy between August 2017 and October 2018 were recruited and randomized into Handout Assisted Consent (HC) and Verbal Consent (VC) group. The HC group was given an adjunct handout on laparoscopic cholecystectomy during consent process in addition to the standard verbal consent. A validated open-ended verbal understanding and recall questionnaire was administered to all patients in both groups at Day 1, 30 and 90 after surgery. Patient satisfaction of the consent process was evaluated with Likert scale. Results: A total of 79 patients were enrolled, 41 patients and 38 patients in VC and HC groups respectively. Level of understanding among patients were equal and consistent across time in both groups (P > 0.05). There was significant decline (P < 0.0001) for both groups in ability to recall information between Day 1 to Day 30 and Day 30 to Day 90. A slightly higher satisfaction rate was found among patients that received HC (P > 0.05). Conclusion: There is good consistent understanding of the surgery in both groups. However, recall of specific surgical consent items decreased significantly over time in both groups. Handouts may have increased satisfaction among patients but did not improve recall in this preliminary study. Trial registration: MREC No.:201783-5468. (c) 2021 Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh (Scottish charity number SC005317) and Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. ROYAL COLLEGE SURGEONS EDINBURGH 2022-06 Article PeerReviewed Koong, Jun Kit and Rajandram, Retnagowri and Sidambram, Naveendran and Narayanan, Vairavan (2022) The effectiveness of handout assisted versus verbal consent on post-operative recall and understanding-A randomized control study. Surgeon-Journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland, 20 (3). pp. 169-176. ISSN 1479-666X, DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2021.04.002 <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2021.04.002>. 10.1016/j.surge.2021.04.002
institution Universiti Malaya
building UM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Malaya
content_source UM Research Repository
url_provider http://eprints.um.edu.my/
topic RD Surgery
spellingShingle RD Surgery
Koong, Jun Kit
Rajandram, Retnagowri
Sidambram, Naveendran
Narayanan, Vairavan
The effectiveness of handout assisted versus verbal consent on post-operative recall and understanding-A randomized control study
description Background: Consent is an important component of surgical care. Poorly attempted consent bears significant ethical and legal implications. We assessed the effectiveness of handouts in improving postoperative consent understanding and recall compared to standard verbal consent during laparoscopic cholecystectomy as a tool that may improve information retention and leads to better treatment satisfaction. Methods: This is a prospective block randomized, non-blinded study conducted at a single tertiary hospital. Patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy between August 2017 and October 2018 were recruited and randomized into Handout Assisted Consent (HC) and Verbal Consent (VC) group. The HC group was given an adjunct handout on laparoscopic cholecystectomy during consent process in addition to the standard verbal consent. A validated open-ended verbal understanding and recall questionnaire was administered to all patients in both groups at Day 1, 30 and 90 after surgery. Patient satisfaction of the consent process was evaluated with Likert scale. Results: A total of 79 patients were enrolled, 41 patients and 38 patients in VC and HC groups respectively. Level of understanding among patients were equal and consistent across time in both groups (P > 0.05). There was significant decline (P < 0.0001) for both groups in ability to recall information between Day 1 to Day 30 and Day 30 to Day 90. A slightly higher satisfaction rate was found among patients that received HC (P > 0.05). Conclusion: There is good consistent understanding of the surgery in both groups. However, recall of specific surgical consent items decreased significantly over time in both groups. Handouts may have increased satisfaction among patients but did not improve recall in this preliminary study. Trial registration: MREC No.:201783-5468. (c) 2021 Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh (Scottish charity number SC005317) and Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
format Article
author Koong, Jun Kit
Rajandram, Retnagowri
Sidambram, Naveendran
Narayanan, Vairavan
author_facet Koong, Jun Kit
Rajandram, Retnagowri
Sidambram, Naveendran
Narayanan, Vairavan
author_sort Koong, Jun Kit
title The effectiveness of handout assisted versus verbal consent on post-operative recall and understanding-A randomized control study
title_short The effectiveness of handout assisted versus verbal consent on post-operative recall and understanding-A randomized control study
title_full The effectiveness of handout assisted versus verbal consent on post-operative recall and understanding-A randomized control study
title_fullStr The effectiveness of handout assisted versus verbal consent on post-operative recall and understanding-A randomized control study
title_full_unstemmed The effectiveness of handout assisted versus verbal consent on post-operative recall and understanding-A randomized control study
title_sort effectiveness of handout assisted versus verbal consent on post-operative recall and understanding-a randomized control study
publisher ROYAL COLLEGE SURGEONS EDINBURGH
publishDate 2022
url http://eprints.um.edu.my/42180/
_version_ 1781704605925638144