Health related quality of life of head & neck cancer patients in the state of Sabah
Cancer of head and neck (HNC) has profound functional, cosmetic and emotional impact on patients. Both the disease and the treatment affect critical functions such as speech, swallowing and emotional wellbeing etc. In nasopharyngeal carcinoma, there is improved local control of the disease with hig...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Research Report |
Language: | English English |
Published: |
Universiti Malaysia Sabah
2005
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/23632/1/Health%20related%20quality%20of%20life%20of%20head%20%26%20neck%20cancer%20patients%20in%20the%20state%20of%20Sabah.pdf https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/23632/6/Health%20related%20quality%20of%20life%20of%20head%20%26%20neck%20cancer%20patients%20in%20the%20state%20of%20Sabah.pdf https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/23632/ |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Universiti Malaysia Sabah |
Language: | English English |
Summary: | Cancer of head and neck (HNC) has profound functional, cosmetic and emotional impact on patients. Both the disease and the treatment affect critical functions such as speech,
swallowing and emotional wellbeing etc. In nasopharyngeal carcinoma, there is improved local control of the disease with higher survival rates with higher radiation
dosage. The frequency and severity of complications such as pituitary hypofunction and otitis media with effusion are however increased.
Our research project was started in June 2005. We surveyed a total number of 117 HNC
patients, out of which 95 cases have nasopharyngeal carcinoma. The EORTe (European
Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer) Quality of life QLQ-C30 (Core
Questionnaire) and EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (supplementary disease specific module) were
used for the survey. The mean score for the different fimctional domains are physical
function 74.8 (SE=1.8), role function 67.1(SE=2.5) • emotional function 66.8 (SE=2.4),
cognitive function 67.7 (SE=2.2), social fimction 71.2 (SE=2.7)and overall quality of life
61.5 (SE=2.3).
Compare to other studies, our patients show lower overall level of quality of life function.
The emotional function in female is significantly lower than that of male; this is in
accordance to that observed in studies from other countries. For head and neck specific
module, the mean score for pain. swallowing, social eating and social contact are better
than senses, speech and sexual function. Because majority of our patients suffered from
nasopharygeal carcinoma, a relatively rare entity in western country series, and also most
of our patients, i.e. 94% underwent radiotherapy, the results are difficult to compare.
There were significant differential effects of ethnic group on the role function, emotional
function. cognitive function and pain in our model. The differential effect is mainly due
to the differences between Chinese and Kadazandusun. The Chinese fare better in terms
of role function, emotional function. cognitive function and are less disturbed by pain
when compared to the Kadazandusun.
The present study has highlighted the effects of head and neck cancer on patient's quality
of life. At present improvement of survival of patient remains the most important
outcome in most clinical research. The results of our study also indicate the possibility of
using quality of life parameters to assess treatment outcomes. Rather than just survival
alone. quality of life parameters should also be included in selecting and deciding
appropriate therapy for patients. |
---|