Patterns and Determinants of Attitudes towards Genetic Risk of Cancer: Case Study in a Malaysian Public University
Genetic risk to cancer is a knowledge largely confined to experts and the more educated sectors of the developed western countries.The perception of genetic susceptibility to cancer among the masses is fragmented, particularly in developing countries. As cancer diseases affect developing countries a...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Hindawi
2018
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/20886/1/Edmund.pdf http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/20886/ https://www.hindawi.com/journals/bmri/ |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Universiti Malaysia Sarawak |
Language: | English |
Summary: | Genetic risk to cancer is a knowledge largely confined to experts and the more educated sectors of the developed western countries.The perception of genetic susceptibility to cancer among the masses is fragmented, particularly in developing countries. As cancer diseases affect developing countries as much as developed nations, it is imperative to study perception and reception of genetic risk to cancer in Southeast Asia. Here, we report on a novel case study to gauge the awareness and attitudes towards genetic
determination of cancer among the undergraduates of a Malaysian public university. A total of 272 university undergraduate
students completed an online questionnaire. On causes of cancer, the respondents believed that cancer is caused by lifestyle and
environmental factors, but those with science background were more likely to associate it with genetic factors. The results on
awareness of genetic profiling of cancer risk showed that there are significant differences between those with science and nonscience
background but there are no significant differences for gender and socioeconomic background. As for attitudes towards cancer
risk, female respondents, those from middle socioeconomic status and science background, are more likely to believe in genetic
determinism of cancer. The findings have implications on target population segmentation in strategic health communication on
cancer. |
---|