Meta-analysis contrasting freshwater biodiversity in forests and oil palm plantations with and without riparian buffers

• Main Authors: Rojas‐Castillo, Oscar Alberto, Kepfer Rojas, Sebastian, Juen, Leandro, Montag, Luciano Fogaça de Assis, Carvalho, Fernando Geraldo, Mendes, Thiago Pereira, Chua, Kenny Wei Jie, Wilkinson, Clare L., Amal, Mohammad Noor Azmai, Fahmi‐Ahmad, Muhammad, Jacobsen, Dean
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Wiley 2024
• Online Access: http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/110375/1/110375.pdf; http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/110375/; https://conbio.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/cobi.14172
• Institution: Universiti Putra Malaysia

The expansion of oil palm plantations has led to land-use change and deforestation in the tropics, which has affected biodiversity. Although the impacts of the crop on terrestrial biodiversity have been extensively reviewed, its effects on freshwater biodiversity remain relatively unexplored. We reviewed the research assessing the impacts of forest-to-oil palm conversion on freshwater biota and the mitigating effect of riparian buffers on these impacts. We searched for studies comparing taxa richness, species abundance, and community composition of macroinvertebrates, amphibians, and fish in streams in forests (primary and disturbed) and oil palm plantations with and without riparian buffers. Then, we conducted a meta-analysis to quantify the overall effect of the land-use change on the 3 taxonomic groups. Twenty-nine studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. On average, plantations lacking buffers hosted 44 and 19 fewer stream taxa than primary and disturbed forests, respectively. Stream taxa on plantations with buffers were 24 lower than in primary forest and did not differ significantly from disturbed forest. In contrast, stream community composition differed between forests and plantations regardless of the presence of riparian buffers. These differences were attributed to agrochemical use and altered environmental conditions in the plantations, including temperature changes, worsened water conditions, microhabitat loss, and food and shelter depletion. On aggregate, abundance did not differ significantly among land uses because increases in generalist species offset the population decline of vulnerable forest specialists in the plantation. Our results reveal significant impacts of forest-to-oil palm conversion on freshwater biota, particularly taxa richness and composition (but not aggregate abundance). Although preserving riparian buffers in the plantations can mitigate the loss of various aquatic species, it cannot conserve primary forest communities. Therefore, safeguarding primary forests from the oil palm expansion is crucial, and further research is needed to address riparian buffers as a promising mitigation strategy in agricultural areas.