Deterministic rainfall induced landslide approaches, advantages and limitations.

There are many approaches to assessing slope stability for landslide susceptibility and hazard mapping that mostly running in GIS platform by define a spatial extension with less error or more successes rate and availability of predictive landslide modeling. These models can be classified into four...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Omar, Husaini, Kim Huat, Bujang, Md Yusoff, Zainuddin, Safaei, Mehrdad, Ghiasi, Vahed
Format: Article
Published: 2011
Online Access:http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/23241/
http://www.ejge.com/2011/Ppr11.177/Abs11.177.htm
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Universiti Putra Malaysia
id my.upm.eprints.23241
record_format eprints
spelling my.upm.eprints.232412014-11-04T07:07:51Z http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/23241/ Deterministic rainfall induced landslide approaches, advantages and limitations. Omar, Husaini Kim Huat, Bujang Md Yusoff, Zainuddin Safaei, Mehrdad Ghiasi, Vahed There are many approaches to assessing slope stability for landslide susceptibility and hazard mapping that mostly running in GIS platform by define a spatial extension with less error or more successes rate and availability of predictive landslide modeling. These models can be classified into four main methods: inventory, heuristic, statistic and deterministic. Recent studies have shown that the best approaches for landslide spatial prediction is the application of deterministic slope stability models, combined with steady state or transient models for hill slope hydrology. These may provide scenarios of potential instability under changing environmental and climatic conditions but are very data demanding at watershed scales. Several authors have developed GIS models by coupling a dynamic hydrological model that simulates the pore pressure over time with a slope stability model that quantifies the susceptibility as the critical pore pressure threshold. Therefore, those require with simplification of the landslides type and depth. The geotechnical model, which is deterministic or probabilistic, has been widely employed in civil engineering and engineering geology for slope stability analysis. A deterministic approach was traditionally considered sufficient for both homogenous and non-homogenous slopes. Calculating the safety factor requires geometrical data and information on the pore water pressure and ground water table. Base on literature review, there is some lack of a systematic comparison of different techniques in order to outline advantages and limitations of the methods to model the spatial distribution of landslides. We can use deterministic approaches for rainfall, and earthquake induced landslide or landslide run out modeling. 2011 Article PeerReviewed Omar, Husaini and Kim Huat, Bujang and Md Yusoff, Zainuddin and Safaei, Mehrdad and Ghiasi, Vahed (2011) Deterministic rainfall induced landslide approaches, advantages and limitations. Electronic Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 16 (U). pp. 1619-1650. ISSN 1089-3032 http://www.ejge.com/2011/Ppr11.177/Abs11.177.htm
institution Universiti Putra Malaysia
building UPM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Putra Malaysia
content_source UPM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://psasir.upm.edu.my/
description There are many approaches to assessing slope stability for landslide susceptibility and hazard mapping that mostly running in GIS platform by define a spatial extension with less error or more successes rate and availability of predictive landslide modeling. These models can be classified into four main methods: inventory, heuristic, statistic and deterministic. Recent studies have shown that the best approaches for landslide spatial prediction is the application of deterministic slope stability models, combined with steady state or transient models for hill slope hydrology. These may provide scenarios of potential instability under changing environmental and climatic conditions but are very data demanding at watershed scales. Several authors have developed GIS models by coupling a dynamic hydrological model that simulates the pore pressure over time with a slope stability model that quantifies the susceptibility as the critical pore pressure threshold. Therefore, those require with simplification of the landslides type and depth. The geotechnical model, which is deterministic or probabilistic, has been widely employed in civil engineering and engineering geology for slope stability analysis. A deterministic approach was traditionally considered sufficient for both homogenous and non-homogenous slopes. Calculating the safety factor requires geometrical data and information on the pore water pressure and ground water table. Base on literature review, there is some lack of a systematic comparison of different techniques in order to outline advantages and limitations of the methods to model the spatial distribution of landslides. We can use deterministic approaches for rainfall, and earthquake induced landslide or landslide run out modeling.
format Article
author Omar, Husaini
Kim Huat, Bujang
Md Yusoff, Zainuddin
Safaei, Mehrdad
Ghiasi, Vahed
spellingShingle Omar, Husaini
Kim Huat, Bujang
Md Yusoff, Zainuddin
Safaei, Mehrdad
Ghiasi, Vahed
Deterministic rainfall induced landslide approaches, advantages and limitations.
author_facet Omar, Husaini
Kim Huat, Bujang
Md Yusoff, Zainuddin
Safaei, Mehrdad
Ghiasi, Vahed
author_sort Omar, Husaini
title Deterministic rainfall induced landslide approaches, advantages and limitations.
title_short Deterministic rainfall induced landslide approaches, advantages and limitations.
title_full Deterministic rainfall induced landslide approaches, advantages and limitations.
title_fullStr Deterministic rainfall induced landslide approaches, advantages and limitations.
title_full_unstemmed Deterministic rainfall induced landslide approaches, advantages and limitations.
title_sort deterministic rainfall induced landslide approaches, advantages and limitations.
publishDate 2011
url http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/23241/
http://www.ejge.com/2011/Ppr11.177/Abs11.177.htm
_version_ 1643827999299076096