Legislative provisions for waṣiyyah wājibah in Malaysia and Indonesia: to what extent do they differ in practice?

Purpose: This research aims to examine and compare differences in waṣiyyah wājibah (obligatory bequest) (WW) practices in Malaysia and Indonesia. Design/methodology/approach: This is an exploratory qualitative research, employing a thematic analysis approach. Six Muslim Wills (State) Enactments [Ena...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alma'amun, Suhaili, Kamarudin, Mohd. Khairy, Wan Mohd. Nasir, Wan Nadiah, Nor Muhamad, Nasrul Hisyam, Ahmad, Riayati
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Emerald Publishing 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/102743/1/MohdKhairyKamarudin2022_LegislativeProvisionsforWasiyyahWajibah.pdf
http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/102743/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJIF-01-2021-0013
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
Language: English
id my.utm.102743
record_format eprints
spelling my.utm.1027432023-09-18T04:21:47Z http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/102743/ Legislative provisions for waṣiyyah wājibah in Malaysia and Indonesia: to what extent do they differ in practice? Alma'amun, Suhaili Kamarudin, Mohd. Khairy Wan Mohd. Nasir, Wan Nadiah Nor Muhamad, Nasrul Hisyam Ahmad, Riayati HG Finance Purpose: This research aims to examine and compare differences in waṣiyyah wājibah (obligatory bequest) (WW) practices in Malaysia and Indonesia. Design/methodology/approach: This is an exploratory qualitative research, employing a thematic analysis approach. Six Muslim Wills (State) Enactments [Enakmen Wasiat Orang Islam (Negeri)] in Malaysia, Islamic Law Compilation (Kompilasi Hukum Islam) in Indonesia, two fatwas (ruling in religious matters) and one court case from each country are analysed. Data is collected from official government websites and other reliable search engines. Findings: First, the findings show that the WW practice in both countries is similar regarding the quantum of the beneficiaries' entitlement. However, the practice varies between both countries in terms of the types of beneficiaries and how the bequest is distributed. Second, this study shows the potential of WW as an estate planning instrument to complement the existing instruments in each country, especially when addressing family members who are not entitled to succeed by farāʾiḍ (Islamic inheritance law). Practical implications: The provision of relevant laws and regulations regarding WW needs to be formulated to guarantee the well-being of dependants. The differences in practice between the two countries can be a guideline to expand the WW scope and context to other Muslim countries. Originality/value: This study is the first attempt to compare WW between two Muslim-majority countries focusing on relevant laws, court cases and regulations. Emerald Publishing 2022 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/102743/1/MohdKhairyKamarudin2022_LegislativeProvisionsforWasiyyahWajibah.pdf Alma'amun, Suhaili and Kamarudin, Mohd. Khairy and Wan Mohd. Nasir, Wan Nadiah and Nor Muhamad, Nasrul Hisyam and Ahmad, Riayati (2022) Legislative provisions for waṣiyyah wājibah in Malaysia and Indonesia: to what extent do they differ in practice? ISRA International Journal of Islamic Finance, 14 (2). pp. 157-174. ISSN 0128-1976 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJIF-01-2021-0013 DOI: 10.1108/IJIF-01-2021-0013
institution Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
building UTM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
content_source UTM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.utm.my/
language English
topic HG Finance
spellingShingle HG Finance
Alma'amun, Suhaili
Kamarudin, Mohd. Khairy
Wan Mohd. Nasir, Wan Nadiah
Nor Muhamad, Nasrul Hisyam
Ahmad, Riayati
Legislative provisions for waṣiyyah wājibah in Malaysia and Indonesia: to what extent do they differ in practice?
description Purpose: This research aims to examine and compare differences in waṣiyyah wājibah (obligatory bequest) (WW) practices in Malaysia and Indonesia. Design/methodology/approach: This is an exploratory qualitative research, employing a thematic analysis approach. Six Muslim Wills (State) Enactments [Enakmen Wasiat Orang Islam (Negeri)] in Malaysia, Islamic Law Compilation (Kompilasi Hukum Islam) in Indonesia, two fatwas (ruling in religious matters) and one court case from each country are analysed. Data is collected from official government websites and other reliable search engines. Findings: First, the findings show that the WW practice in both countries is similar regarding the quantum of the beneficiaries' entitlement. However, the practice varies between both countries in terms of the types of beneficiaries and how the bequest is distributed. Second, this study shows the potential of WW as an estate planning instrument to complement the existing instruments in each country, especially when addressing family members who are not entitled to succeed by farāʾiḍ (Islamic inheritance law). Practical implications: The provision of relevant laws and regulations regarding WW needs to be formulated to guarantee the well-being of dependants. The differences in practice between the two countries can be a guideline to expand the WW scope and context to other Muslim countries. Originality/value: This study is the first attempt to compare WW between two Muslim-majority countries focusing on relevant laws, court cases and regulations.
format Article
author Alma'amun, Suhaili
Kamarudin, Mohd. Khairy
Wan Mohd. Nasir, Wan Nadiah
Nor Muhamad, Nasrul Hisyam
Ahmad, Riayati
author_facet Alma'amun, Suhaili
Kamarudin, Mohd. Khairy
Wan Mohd. Nasir, Wan Nadiah
Nor Muhamad, Nasrul Hisyam
Ahmad, Riayati
author_sort Alma'amun, Suhaili
title Legislative provisions for waṣiyyah wājibah in Malaysia and Indonesia: to what extent do they differ in practice?
title_short Legislative provisions for waṣiyyah wājibah in Malaysia and Indonesia: to what extent do they differ in practice?
title_full Legislative provisions for waṣiyyah wājibah in Malaysia and Indonesia: to what extent do they differ in practice?
title_fullStr Legislative provisions for waṣiyyah wājibah in Malaysia and Indonesia: to what extent do they differ in practice?
title_full_unstemmed Legislative provisions for waṣiyyah wājibah in Malaysia and Indonesia: to what extent do they differ in practice?
title_sort legislative provisions for waṣiyyah wājibah in malaysia and indonesia: to what extent do they differ in practice?
publisher Emerald Publishing
publishDate 2022
url http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/102743/1/MohdKhairyKamarudin2022_LegislativeProvisionsforWasiyyahWajibah.pdf
http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/102743/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJIF-01-2021-0013
_version_ 1778160774992101376