Legislative provisions for waṣiyyah wājibah in Malaysia and Indonesia: to what extent do they differ in practice?
Purpose: This research aims to examine and compare differences in waṣiyyah wājibah (obligatory bequest) (WW) practices in Malaysia and Indonesia. Design/methodology/approach: This is an exploratory qualitative research, employing a thematic analysis approach. Six Muslim Wills (State) Enactments [Ena...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Emerald Publishing
2022
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/102743/1/MohdKhairyKamarudin2022_LegislativeProvisionsforWasiyyahWajibah.pdf http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/102743/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJIF-01-2021-0013 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Universiti Teknologi Malaysia |
Language: | English |
id |
my.utm.102743 |
---|---|
record_format |
eprints |
spelling |
my.utm.1027432023-09-18T04:21:47Z http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/102743/ Legislative provisions for waṣiyyah wājibah in Malaysia and Indonesia: to what extent do they differ in practice? Alma'amun, Suhaili Kamarudin, Mohd. Khairy Wan Mohd. Nasir, Wan Nadiah Nor Muhamad, Nasrul Hisyam Ahmad, Riayati HG Finance Purpose: This research aims to examine and compare differences in waṣiyyah wājibah (obligatory bequest) (WW) practices in Malaysia and Indonesia. Design/methodology/approach: This is an exploratory qualitative research, employing a thematic analysis approach. Six Muslim Wills (State) Enactments [Enakmen Wasiat Orang Islam (Negeri)] in Malaysia, Islamic Law Compilation (Kompilasi Hukum Islam) in Indonesia, two fatwas (ruling in religious matters) and one court case from each country are analysed. Data is collected from official government websites and other reliable search engines. Findings: First, the findings show that the WW practice in both countries is similar regarding the quantum of the beneficiaries' entitlement. However, the practice varies between both countries in terms of the types of beneficiaries and how the bequest is distributed. Second, this study shows the potential of WW as an estate planning instrument to complement the existing instruments in each country, especially when addressing family members who are not entitled to succeed by farāʾiḍ (Islamic inheritance law). Practical implications: The provision of relevant laws and regulations regarding WW needs to be formulated to guarantee the well-being of dependants. The differences in practice between the two countries can be a guideline to expand the WW scope and context to other Muslim countries. Originality/value: This study is the first attempt to compare WW between two Muslim-majority countries focusing on relevant laws, court cases and regulations. Emerald Publishing 2022 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/102743/1/MohdKhairyKamarudin2022_LegislativeProvisionsforWasiyyahWajibah.pdf Alma'amun, Suhaili and Kamarudin, Mohd. Khairy and Wan Mohd. Nasir, Wan Nadiah and Nor Muhamad, Nasrul Hisyam and Ahmad, Riayati (2022) Legislative provisions for waṣiyyah wājibah in Malaysia and Indonesia: to what extent do they differ in practice? ISRA International Journal of Islamic Finance, 14 (2). pp. 157-174. ISSN 0128-1976 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJIF-01-2021-0013 DOI: 10.1108/IJIF-01-2021-0013 |
institution |
Universiti Teknologi Malaysia |
building |
UTM Library |
collection |
Institutional Repository |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Malaysia |
content_provider |
Universiti Teknologi Malaysia |
content_source |
UTM Institutional Repository |
url_provider |
http://eprints.utm.my/ |
language |
English |
topic |
HG Finance |
spellingShingle |
HG Finance Alma'amun, Suhaili Kamarudin, Mohd. Khairy Wan Mohd. Nasir, Wan Nadiah Nor Muhamad, Nasrul Hisyam Ahmad, Riayati Legislative provisions for waṣiyyah wājibah in Malaysia and Indonesia: to what extent do they differ in practice? |
description |
Purpose: This research aims to examine and compare differences in waṣiyyah wājibah (obligatory bequest) (WW) practices in Malaysia and Indonesia. Design/methodology/approach: This is an exploratory qualitative research, employing a thematic analysis approach. Six Muslim Wills (State) Enactments [Enakmen Wasiat Orang Islam (Negeri)] in Malaysia, Islamic Law Compilation (Kompilasi Hukum Islam) in Indonesia, two fatwas (ruling in religious matters) and one court case from each country are analysed. Data is collected from official government websites and other reliable search engines. Findings: First, the findings show that the WW practice in both countries is similar regarding the quantum of the beneficiaries' entitlement. However, the practice varies between both countries in terms of the types of beneficiaries and how the bequest is distributed. Second, this study shows the potential of WW as an estate planning instrument to complement the existing instruments in each country, especially when addressing family members who are not entitled to succeed by farāʾiḍ (Islamic inheritance law). Practical implications: The provision of relevant laws and regulations regarding WW needs to be formulated to guarantee the well-being of dependants. The differences in practice between the two countries can be a guideline to expand the WW scope and context to other Muslim countries. Originality/value: This study is the first attempt to compare WW between two Muslim-majority countries focusing on relevant laws, court cases and regulations. |
format |
Article |
author |
Alma'amun, Suhaili Kamarudin, Mohd. Khairy Wan Mohd. Nasir, Wan Nadiah Nor Muhamad, Nasrul Hisyam Ahmad, Riayati |
author_facet |
Alma'amun, Suhaili Kamarudin, Mohd. Khairy Wan Mohd. Nasir, Wan Nadiah Nor Muhamad, Nasrul Hisyam Ahmad, Riayati |
author_sort |
Alma'amun, Suhaili |
title |
Legislative provisions for waṣiyyah wājibah in Malaysia and Indonesia: to what extent do they differ in practice? |
title_short |
Legislative provisions for waṣiyyah wājibah in Malaysia and Indonesia: to what extent do they differ in practice? |
title_full |
Legislative provisions for waṣiyyah wājibah in Malaysia and Indonesia: to what extent do they differ in practice? |
title_fullStr |
Legislative provisions for waṣiyyah wājibah in Malaysia and Indonesia: to what extent do they differ in practice? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Legislative provisions for waṣiyyah wājibah in Malaysia and Indonesia: to what extent do they differ in practice? |
title_sort |
legislative provisions for waṣiyyah wājibah in malaysia and indonesia: to what extent do they differ in practice? |
publisher |
Emerald Publishing |
publishDate |
2022 |
url |
http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/102743/1/MohdKhairyKamarudin2022_LegislativeProvisionsforWasiyyahWajibah.pdf http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/102743/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJIF-01-2021-0013 |
_version_ |
1778160774992101376 |