Splitting solver with immersed boundary extension for the analysis of backward-facing step flow
Flow analysis of backward-facing step is claimed to be a necessity when it comes to Computational Fluid Dynamics solver validation. The turbulence development with both separation and reattachment passing through the step has become the practical challenge for solver developers ever since the numeri...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Book Section |
Published: |
American Institute of Physics
2012
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/36027/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4704319 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Universiti Teknologi Malaysia |
id |
my.utm.36027 |
---|---|
record_format |
eprints |
spelling |
my.utm.360272017-02-04T05:53:13Z http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/36027/ Splitting solver with immersed boundary extension for the analysis of backward-facing step flow Ngali, Zamani Osman, Kahar Johari, Nasrul Hadi TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery Flow analysis of backward-facing step is claimed to be a necessity when it comes to Computational Fluid Dynamics solver validation. The turbulence development with both separation and reattachment passing through the step has become the practical challenge for solver developers ever since the numerical computation revolution started. In-line with the trend, this work is predestined to further validate the use of Splitting velocity-pressure coupling method with immersed boundary extension for unsteady Navier-Stokes flow solver. The comparison is launched with steady numerical results via established software for commonly used benchmark backward-facing step construction. Flow parameters in both solvers are set equivalent to Reynolds number of 1000. The assessment is carried out when the flow has reached steady flow condition. The streamwise velocity profiles are well-matched where the maximum error is within 4%. The reattachment distance measured from the developed solver is also in good agreement with the reference results with only 1.84% difference recorded. The comparison proves that the solver developed in this work could become a very handy alternative especially when we look at the solver simplicity and the number of nodes it consumes to obtain comparable results. American Institute of Physics 2012 Book Section PeerReviewed Ngali, Zamani and Osman, Kahar and Johari, Nasrul Hadi (2012) Splitting solver with immersed boundary extension for the analysis of backward-facing step flow. In: AIP Conference Proceedings. American Institute of Physics, Maryland, USA, pp. 1040-1048. ISBN 978-073541032-9 http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4704319 DOI:10.1063/1.4704319 |
institution |
Universiti Teknologi Malaysia |
building |
UTM Library |
collection |
Institutional Repository |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Malaysia |
content_provider |
Universiti Teknologi Malaysia |
content_source |
UTM Institutional Repository |
url_provider |
http://eprints.utm.my/ |
topic |
TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery |
spellingShingle |
TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery Ngali, Zamani Osman, Kahar Johari, Nasrul Hadi Splitting solver with immersed boundary extension for the analysis of backward-facing step flow |
description |
Flow analysis of backward-facing step is claimed to be a necessity when it comes to Computational Fluid Dynamics solver validation. The turbulence development with both separation and reattachment passing through the step has become the practical challenge for solver developers ever since the numerical computation revolution started. In-line with the trend, this work is predestined to further validate the use of Splitting velocity-pressure coupling method with immersed boundary extension for unsteady Navier-Stokes flow solver. The comparison is launched with steady numerical results via established software for commonly used benchmark backward-facing step construction. Flow parameters in both solvers are set equivalent to Reynolds number of 1000. The assessment is carried out when the flow has reached steady flow condition. The streamwise velocity profiles are well-matched where the maximum error is within 4%. The reattachment distance measured from the developed solver is also in good agreement with the reference results with only 1.84% difference recorded. The comparison proves that the solver developed in this work could become a very handy alternative especially when we look at the solver simplicity and the number of nodes it consumes to obtain comparable results. |
format |
Book Section |
author |
Ngali, Zamani Osman, Kahar Johari, Nasrul Hadi |
author_facet |
Ngali, Zamani Osman, Kahar Johari, Nasrul Hadi |
author_sort |
Ngali, Zamani |
title |
Splitting solver with immersed boundary extension for the analysis of backward-facing step flow |
title_short |
Splitting solver with immersed boundary extension for the analysis of backward-facing step flow |
title_full |
Splitting solver with immersed boundary extension for the analysis of backward-facing step flow |
title_fullStr |
Splitting solver with immersed boundary extension for the analysis of backward-facing step flow |
title_full_unstemmed |
Splitting solver with immersed boundary extension for the analysis of backward-facing step flow |
title_sort |
splitting solver with immersed boundary extension for the analysis of backward-facing step flow |
publisher |
American Institute of Physics |
publishDate |
2012 |
url |
http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/36027/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4704319 |
_version_ |
1643649882577174528 |