A review of genre approaches within linguistic traditions

This paper reviews three major approaches to genre analysis; Rhetorical Genre Studies (RGS), English for Specific Purposes (ESP) and Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL). Based on the review, it is noted that RGS is an approach which regards genre as a form of social action involving analysis of ge...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wan Fakhruddin, Wan Farah Wani, Hassan, Hanita
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Penerbit UTM Press 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/60087/1/HanitaHassan2015_AReviewofGenreApproacheswithinLinguisticTraditions.pdf
http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/60087/
http://dx.doi.org/10.11113/lspi.v2n2.28
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
Language: English
id my.utm.60087
record_format eprints
spelling my.utm.600872022-04-07T01:19:43Z http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/60087/ A review of genre approaches within linguistic traditions Wan Fakhruddin, Wan Farah Wani Hassan, Hanita H Social Sciences (General) This paper reviews three major approaches to genre analysis; Rhetorical Genre Studies (RGS), English for Specific Purposes (ESP) and Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL). Based on the review, it is noted that RGS is an approach which regards genre as a form of social action involving analysis of genre through detailed accounts of the social and cultural contexts with an emphasis on how a genre fulfills its social purpose and actions. On the other hand, ESP is an approach which views genre as a communicative event characterised by their communicative purposes as well as rhetorical features where the discourse community acts as those which recognises and sanctions the acceptance of a genre. The final genre approach, which is SFL, perceives genre as the cultural purpose of texts, achieved through a genre's structural and realisational patterns where meanings are made within the genre. Overall, the ESP and SFL approaches share fundamental view that linguistic features of texts are connected to social context and function. Thus both of the approaches take on a linguistic approach in describing genres. RGS, in contrast, investigates genres through the study of society in which genre is being used thus taking an ethnographic approach to analysis of genres. This paper concludes with a discussion on the concept of genre presented in the various approaches and the possible emergence of other approaches in the study of genre. Penerbit UTM Press 2015 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/60087/1/HanitaHassan2015_AReviewofGenreApproacheswithinLinguisticTraditions.pdf Wan Fakhruddin, Wan Farah Wani and Hassan, Hanita (2015) A review of genre approaches within linguistic traditions. LSP International Journal, 2 (2). pp. 53-68. ISSN 2289-3199 http://dx.doi.org/10.11113/lspi.v2n2.28
institution Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
building UTM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
content_source UTM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.utm.my/
language English
topic H Social Sciences (General)
spellingShingle H Social Sciences (General)
Wan Fakhruddin, Wan Farah Wani
Hassan, Hanita
A review of genre approaches within linguistic traditions
description This paper reviews three major approaches to genre analysis; Rhetorical Genre Studies (RGS), English for Specific Purposes (ESP) and Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL). Based on the review, it is noted that RGS is an approach which regards genre as a form of social action involving analysis of genre through detailed accounts of the social and cultural contexts with an emphasis on how a genre fulfills its social purpose and actions. On the other hand, ESP is an approach which views genre as a communicative event characterised by their communicative purposes as well as rhetorical features where the discourse community acts as those which recognises and sanctions the acceptance of a genre. The final genre approach, which is SFL, perceives genre as the cultural purpose of texts, achieved through a genre's structural and realisational patterns where meanings are made within the genre. Overall, the ESP and SFL approaches share fundamental view that linguistic features of texts are connected to social context and function. Thus both of the approaches take on a linguistic approach in describing genres. RGS, in contrast, investigates genres through the study of society in which genre is being used thus taking an ethnographic approach to analysis of genres. This paper concludes with a discussion on the concept of genre presented in the various approaches and the possible emergence of other approaches in the study of genre.
format Article
author Wan Fakhruddin, Wan Farah Wani
Hassan, Hanita
author_facet Wan Fakhruddin, Wan Farah Wani
Hassan, Hanita
author_sort Wan Fakhruddin, Wan Farah Wani
title A review of genre approaches within linguistic traditions
title_short A review of genre approaches within linguistic traditions
title_full A review of genre approaches within linguistic traditions
title_fullStr A review of genre approaches within linguistic traditions
title_full_unstemmed A review of genre approaches within linguistic traditions
title_sort review of genre approaches within linguistic traditions
publisher Penerbit UTM Press
publishDate 2015
url http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/60087/1/HanitaHassan2015_AReviewofGenreApproacheswithinLinguisticTraditions.pdf
http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/60087/
http://dx.doi.org/10.11113/lspi.v2n2.28
_version_ 1729703253611905024