Comparison of LULU and Median Filter for Image Denoising
This paper presents a comparison between LULU and Median filters for impulse noise in images. Noise removal from images is always a challenging area of research. Different methods are being used for different image noises such as Wiener filter for Gaussian noise, Frost filter for speckle noise...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Conference or Workshop Item |
Published: |
2011
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://eprints.utp.edu.my/4455/1/2011_ICSAP-Roushanak.pdf http://eprints.utp.edu.my/4455/ |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Universiti Teknologi Petronas |
id |
my.utp.eprints.4455 |
---|---|
record_format |
eprints |
spelling |
my.utp.eprints.44552017-01-19T08:23:00Z Comparison of LULU and Median Filter for Image Denoising Rahmat, Roushanak Malik , Aamir Saeed Kamel , Nidal TK Electrical engineering. Electronics Nuclear engineering This paper presents a comparison between LULU and Median filters for impulse noise in images. Noise removal from images is always a challenging area of research. Different methods are being used for different image noises such as Wiener filter for Gaussian noise, Frost filter for speckle noise and median filter for impulse noise. LULU filters are widely being used for impulse noise too. LULU filters are nonlinear rank selector operators which are computationally more competent and the performance of the operator is straightforward to describe. The comparison between Median and LULU filters, in this paper, is performed using two different image quality metrics which are RMSE and PSNR. 2011-02 Conference or Workshop Item PeerReviewed application/pdf http://eprints.utp.edu.my/4455/1/2011_ICSAP-Roushanak.pdf Rahmat, Roushanak and Malik , Aamir Saeed and Kamel , Nidal (2011) Comparison of LULU and Median Filter for Image Denoising. In: 3rd International Conference on Signal Acquisition and Processing, 26-28 February 2011, Singapore. http://eprints.utp.edu.my/4455/ |
institution |
Universiti Teknologi Petronas |
building |
UTP Resource Centre |
collection |
Institutional Repository |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Malaysia |
content_provider |
Universiti Teknologi Petronas |
content_source |
UTP Institutional Repository |
url_provider |
http://eprints.utp.edu.my/ |
topic |
TK Electrical engineering. Electronics Nuclear engineering |
spellingShingle |
TK Electrical engineering. Electronics Nuclear engineering Rahmat, Roushanak Malik , Aamir Saeed Kamel , Nidal Comparison of LULU and Median Filter for Image Denoising |
description |
This paper presents a comparison between LULU
and Median filters for impulse noise in images. Noise removal
from images is always a challenging area of research. Different
methods are being used for different image noises such as
Wiener filter for Gaussian noise, Frost filter for speckle noise
and median filter for impulse noise. LULU filters are widely
being used for impulse noise too. LULU filters are nonlinear
rank selector operators which are computationally more
competent and the performance of the operator is
straightforward to describe. The comparison between Median
and LULU filters, in this paper, is performed using two
different image quality metrics which are RMSE and PSNR. |
format |
Conference or Workshop Item |
author |
Rahmat, Roushanak Malik , Aamir Saeed Kamel , Nidal |
author_facet |
Rahmat, Roushanak Malik , Aamir Saeed Kamel , Nidal |
author_sort |
Rahmat, Roushanak |
title |
Comparison of LULU and Median Filter for Image Denoising |
title_short |
Comparison of LULU and Median Filter for Image Denoising |
title_full |
Comparison of LULU and Median Filter for Image Denoising |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of LULU and Median Filter for Image Denoising |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of LULU and Median Filter for Image Denoising |
title_sort |
comparison of lulu and median filter for image denoising |
publishDate |
2011 |
url |
http://eprints.utp.edu.my/4455/1/2011_ICSAP-Roushanak.pdf http://eprints.utp.edu.my/4455/ |
_version_ |
1738655341482082304 |