Copyright Exceptions for Teaching and Research Purposes: A Comparative Study Between Palestine and Malaysia

Copyright exceptions for teaching and research purposes have turned into a significant issue for achieving a balance between the copyright owner and copyright users. The regulation of this issue is reflected in the Copyright Acts 1911 and 1987 for Palestine and Malaysia, respectively. The Palestine...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Qtait, Mohammed Mahmoud, Awang, Mohammed Nizam, A. Shukor, Haliza, Ghulam Khan, Intan Nadia
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: UUM Press 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/29688/1/UUMJLS%2014%2002%202023%20633-655.pdf
https://doi.org/10.32890/uumjls2023.14.2.9
https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/29688/
https://e-journal.uum.edu.my/index.php/uumjls/article/view/15270
https://doi.org/10.32890/uumjls2023.14.2.9
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Universiti Utara Malaysia
Language: English
id my.uum.repo.29688
record_format eprints
spelling my.uum.repo.296882023-08-14T08:35:53Z https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/29688/ Copyright Exceptions for Teaching and Research Purposes: A Comparative Study Between Palestine and Malaysia Qtait, Mohammed Mahmoud Awang, Mohammed Nizam A. Shukor, Haliza Ghulam Khan, Intan Nadia K Law (General) Copyright exceptions for teaching and research purposes have turned into a significant issue for achieving a balance between the copyright owner and copyright users. The regulation of this issue is reflected in the Copyright Acts 1911 and 1987 for Palestine and Malaysia, respectively. The Palestine Copyright Act 1911 dismisses teaching and research copyright exceptions in detail and has not been amended since 1911; signifying a huge setback in regulating this issue and the pressing need to improvise the Act in order to achieve a balance between the copyright owner and copyright users. The present study has looked into the teaching and research exceptions detailed in the Palestine Copyright Act 1911 with the aim of suggesting improvements in the Act. The comparative research approach was used, along with a functional method. The findings revealed that the Malaysia Copyright Act 1987 offers several provisions in regulating the teaching and research exceptions based on a fair dealing rule, while the Palestine Copyright Act 1911 lacked provisions in regulating these exceptions despite its fair dealing principle. This points to the need for improvements in the Palestine Copyright Act 1911. UUM Press 2023 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en cc4_by https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/29688/1/UUMJLS%2014%2002%202023%20633-655.pdf Qtait, Mohammed Mahmoud and Awang, Mohammed Nizam and A. Shukor, Haliza and Ghulam Khan, Intan Nadia (2023) Copyright Exceptions for Teaching and Research Purposes: A Comparative Study Between Palestine and Malaysia. UUM Journal of Legal Studies (UUMJLS), 14 (2). pp. 633-655. ISSN 2229-984X https://e-journal.uum.edu.my/index.php/uumjls/article/view/15270 https://doi.org/10.32890/uumjls2023.14.2.9 https://doi.org/10.32890/uumjls2023.14.2.9
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
building UUM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Utara Malaysia
content_source UUM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://repo.uum.edu.my/
language English
topic K Law (General)
spellingShingle K Law (General)
Qtait, Mohammed Mahmoud
Awang, Mohammed Nizam
A. Shukor, Haliza
Ghulam Khan, Intan Nadia
Copyright Exceptions for Teaching and Research Purposes: A Comparative Study Between Palestine and Malaysia
description Copyright exceptions for teaching and research purposes have turned into a significant issue for achieving a balance between the copyright owner and copyright users. The regulation of this issue is reflected in the Copyright Acts 1911 and 1987 for Palestine and Malaysia, respectively. The Palestine Copyright Act 1911 dismisses teaching and research copyright exceptions in detail and has not been amended since 1911; signifying a huge setback in regulating this issue and the pressing need to improvise the Act in order to achieve a balance between the copyright owner and copyright users. The present study has looked into the teaching and research exceptions detailed in the Palestine Copyright Act 1911 with the aim of suggesting improvements in the Act. The comparative research approach was used, along with a functional method. The findings revealed that the Malaysia Copyright Act 1987 offers several provisions in regulating the teaching and research exceptions based on a fair dealing rule, while the Palestine Copyright Act 1911 lacked provisions in regulating these exceptions despite its fair dealing principle. This points to the need for improvements in the Palestine Copyright Act 1911.
format Article
author Qtait, Mohammed Mahmoud
Awang, Mohammed Nizam
A. Shukor, Haliza
Ghulam Khan, Intan Nadia
author_facet Qtait, Mohammed Mahmoud
Awang, Mohammed Nizam
A. Shukor, Haliza
Ghulam Khan, Intan Nadia
author_sort Qtait, Mohammed Mahmoud
title Copyright Exceptions for Teaching and Research Purposes: A Comparative Study Between Palestine and Malaysia
title_short Copyright Exceptions for Teaching and Research Purposes: A Comparative Study Between Palestine and Malaysia
title_full Copyright Exceptions for Teaching and Research Purposes: A Comparative Study Between Palestine and Malaysia
title_fullStr Copyright Exceptions for Teaching and Research Purposes: A Comparative Study Between Palestine and Malaysia
title_full_unstemmed Copyright Exceptions for Teaching and Research Purposes: A Comparative Study Between Palestine and Malaysia
title_sort copyright exceptions for teaching and research purposes: a comparative study between palestine and malaysia
publisher UUM Press
publishDate 2023
url https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/29688/1/UUMJLS%2014%2002%202023%20633-655.pdf
https://doi.org/10.32890/uumjls2023.14.2.9
https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/29688/
https://e-journal.uum.edu.my/index.php/uumjls/article/view/15270
https://doi.org/10.32890/uumjls2023.14.2.9
_version_ 1775625717414887424