Rights as trumps and order as counter-trumps: re-examining free speech theory in an era of fear, hate and lies
The constitutional order embodies an arena where interests compete; in interpreting constitutional liberties, relevant interests are identified, weighed and accorded value; these may be optimalised, in ensuring no interest is overridden, such as through subjecting rights to reasonable or proportiona...
محفوظ في:
| المؤلف الرئيسي: | |
|---|---|
| مؤلفون آخرون: | |
| التنسيق: | Conference or Workshop Item |
| اللغة: | Vietnamese |
| منشور في: |
Đại học Quốc Gia Hà Nội
2020
|
| الموضوعات: | |
| الوصول للمادة أونلاين: | http://repository.vnu.edu.vn/handle/VNU_123/94793 |
| الوسوم: |
إضافة وسم
لا توجد وسوم, كن أول من يضع وسما على هذه التسجيلة!
|
| المؤسسة: | Vietnam National University, Hanoi |
| اللغة: | Vietnamese |
| الملخص: | The constitutional order embodies an arena where interests compete; in interpreting constitutional liberties, relevant interests are identified, weighed and accorded value; these may be optimalised, in ensuring no interest is overridden, such as through subjecting rights to reasonable or proportionate restrictions, as opposed to statist criteria such as expediency which may render a right nugatory. Although this process encounters difficulties in identifying relevant interests and in constructing the metric for assigning weight to them, this method of balancing rights and competing interests is viewed as a rational form of decision-making. |
|---|