L1 and L2 syntactic ambiguity resolution of relative clauses
Syntactic ambiguity resolution is a cognitive mechanism that interacts with a range oflinguistic skills vital to comprehension. Research in this area has, for most of the time, involved European languages. Meanwhile, there is scant literature on a vast range of languages that possess distinct typolo...
Saved in:
主要作者: | |
---|---|
格式: | text |
出版: |
Animo Repository
2021
|
主題: | |
在線閱讀: | https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/faculty_research/11110 |
標簽: |
添加標簽
沒有標簽, 成為第一個標記此記錄!
|
總結: | Syntactic ambiguity resolution is a cognitive mechanism that interacts with a range oflinguistic skills vital to comprehension. Research in this area has, for most of the time, involved European languages. Meanwhile, there is scant literature on a vast range of languages that possess distinct typological features that may hold an important role in unique and underexplored syntactic processes. Basing upon the Garden-Path Model, this study identifies attachment preference in two less explored languages, Tagalog and Kinaray-a, and in L2 English through relative clause parsing experiments. This also attempts to determine whether adjectival modification of noun phrases has a relationship with attachment preference scores. Chi-square tests of independence were conducted on experimental data and revealed a minimal relationship between select types of relative clauses according to adjectival modification and attachment preference. Data show contrasting patterns between Tagalog and Kinaray-a groups, where the former marginally lean towards low attachment (N2) and the latter towards high attachment (NI). Similar to Kinaraya L2 English attachment preference takes the N 1 path, a contradiction to past findings on L 1 English. |
---|