On categorization : stick to the facts of the languages

This paper argues that in doing both description and comparison we should work inductively, staying true to the facts of the languages as manifested in natural data, and not resort to abstractions that lead to classifying languages or constructions in a way that ignores the actual facts of the langu...

全面介紹

Saved in:
書目詳細資料
主要作者: LaPolla, Randy J.
其他作者: School of Humanities
格式: Article
語言:English
出版: 2020
主題:
在線閱讀:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/145435
標簽: 添加標簽
沒有標簽, 成為第一個標記此記錄!
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-145435
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-1454352023-03-11T20:06:34Z On categorization : stick to the facts of the languages LaPolla, Randy J. School of Humanities Humanities::Linguistics Categories Comparison This paper argues that in doing both description and comparison we should work inductively, staying true to the facts of the languages as manifested in natural data, and not resort to abstractions that lead to classifying languages or constructions in a way that ignores the actual facts of the languages. A non-Structuralist alternative view of communication and typological description is also presented. Published version 2020-12-21T08:35:50Z 2020-12-21T08:35:50Z 2016 Journal Article LaPolla, R. J. (2016). On categorization : stick to the facts of the languages. Linguistic Typology, 20(2), 365-375. doi:10.1515/lingty-2016-0011 1430-0532 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/145435 10.1515/lingty-2016-0011 2 20 365 375 en Linguistic Typology © 2016 De Gruyter Mouton. All rights reserved. This paper was published in Linguistic Typology and is made available with permission of De Gruyter Mouton. application/pdf
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider NTU Library
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic Humanities::Linguistics
Categories
Comparison
spellingShingle Humanities::Linguistics
Categories
Comparison
LaPolla, Randy J.
On categorization : stick to the facts of the languages
description This paper argues that in doing both description and comparison we should work inductively, staying true to the facts of the languages as manifested in natural data, and not resort to abstractions that lead to classifying languages or constructions in a way that ignores the actual facts of the languages. A non-Structuralist alternative view of communication and typological description is also presented.
author2 School of Humanities
author_facet School of Humanities
LaPolla, Randy J.
format Article
author LaPolla, Randy J.
author_sort LaPolla, Randy J.
title On categorization : stick to the facts of the languages
title_short On categorization : stick to the facts of the languages
title_full On categorization : stick to the facts of the languages
title_fullStr On categorization : stick to the facts of the languages
title_full_unstemmed On categorization : stick to the facts of the languages
title_sort on categorization : stick to the facts of the languages
publishDate 2020
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/145435
_version_ 1761781788616687616