Points of contention: Qualitative research identifying where researchers and research ethics committees disagree about consent waivers for secondary research with tissue and data
10.1371/journal.pone.0235618
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Ballantyne, A., Moore, A., Bartholomew, K., Aagaard, N. |
---|---|
Other Authors: | DEAN'S OFFICE (MEDICINE) |
Format: | Article |
Published: |
Public Library of Science
2021
|
Online Access: | https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/197632 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | National University of Singapore |
Similar Items
-
Waiver of consent in clinical observational research
by: Panuwat Lertsithichai
Published: (2018) -
Consent and the ethical duty to participate in health data research
by: Ballantyne A., et al.
Published: (2019) -
Clarifying how to deploy the public interest criterion in consent waivers for health data and tissue research
by: Schaefer, G.O., et al.
Published: (2021) -
Current status of the research ethics committees in Thailand
by: Panichkul S., et al.
Published: (2014) -
Informed Consent to Future Research on Stored Tissue Samples: the Views of Researchers, Ethics Review Committee Members and Policy Makers in Five Non-Western Countries
by: Kenji Matsui, et al.
Published: (2018)