Zhong Hui (Chung Hui, 225–264 C.E.) in Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Zhong Hui (Chung Hui) was a major philosophical figure during China’s early medieval period (220-589 CE). An accomplished interpreter of the Laozi and the Yijing, Zhong Hui contributed significantly to the early development of xuanxue—literally “learning” (xue) of the “dark” or “mysterious” (xuan) D...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2007
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cis_research/311 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/cis_research/article/1310/viewcontent/Zhong_Hui.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.cis_research-1310 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.cis_research-13102025-04-24T16:56:10Z Zhong Hui (Chung Hui, 225–264 C.E.) in Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy CHAN, Alan Kam Leung Zhong Hui (Chung Hui) was a major philosophical figure during China’s early medieval period (220-589 CE). An accomplished interpreter of the Laozi and the Yijing, Zhong Hui contributed significantly to the early development of xuanxue—literally “learning” (xue) of the “dark” or “mysterious” (xuan) Dao (“Way”), but sometimes translated as “Neo-Daoism“. He also was a major political figure whose ambition eventually led to his untimely demise. Virtually all of Zhong Hui’s writings have been lost, which perhaps explains why he has been given scant attention by students of Chinese philosophy. Had he not failed in his attempt to overthrow the regime of his day, no doubt his writings would have been preserved and given the attention they justly deserve. In particular, his views on human “capacity and nature” (caixing), as developed in his interpretation of the Laozi, are major contributions to xuanxue philosophy, which dominated the Chinese intellectual scene from the third to the sixth century CE. In contrast to other thinkers of the time, who argued that capacity and nature are the same (tong), different (yi), or diverge from one another (li), Zhong Hui argued that they coincide (he). In effect, he proposed that what is endowed is potential, which must be carefully nurtured and brought to completion through learning and effort. While one’s native endowment is not sufficient, one must have some material to begin with in order to achieve the desired result. Thus, it cannot be said that the latter has nothing to do with the former. 2007-06-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cis_research/311 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/cis_research/article/1310/viewcontent/Zhong_Hui.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection College of Integrative Studies eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Asian Studies Philosophy |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
Asian Studies Philosophy |
spellingShingle |
Asian Studies Philosophy CHAN, Alan Kam Leung Zhong Hui (Chung Hui, 225–264 C.E.) in Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy |
description |
Zhong Hui (Chung Hui) was a major philosophical figure during China’s early medieval period (220-589 CE). An accomplished interpreter of the Laozi and the Yijing, Zhong Hui contributed significantly to the early development of xuanxue—literally “learning” (xue) of the “dark” or “mysterious” (xuan) Dao (“Way”), but sometimes translated as “Neo-Daoism“. He also was a major political figure whose ambition eventually led to his untimely demise. Virtually all of Zhong Hui’s writings have been lost, which perhaps explains why he has been given scant attention by students of Chinese philosophy. Had he not failed in his attempt to overthrow the regime of his day, no doubt his writings would have been preserved and given the attention they justly deserve. In particular, his views on human “capacity and nature” (caixing), as developed in his interpretation of the Laozi, are major contributions to xuanxue philosophy, which dominated the Chinese intellectual scene from the third to the sixth century CE. In contrast to other thinkers of the time, who argued that capacity and nature are the same (tong), different (yi), or diverge from one another (li), Zhong Hui argued that they coincide (he). In effect, he proposed that what is endowed is potential, which must be carefully nurtured and brought to completion through learning and effort. While one’s native endowment is not sufficient, one must have some material to begin with in order to achieve the desired result. Thus, it cannot be said that the latter has nothing to do with the former. |
format |
text |
author |
CHAN, Alan Kam Leung |
author_facet |
CHAN, Alan Kam Leung |
author_sort |
CHAN, Alan Kam Leung |
title |
Zhong Hui (Chung Hui, 225–264 C.E.) in Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy |
title_short |
Zhong Hui (Chung Hui, 225–264 C.E.) in Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy |
title_full |
Zhong Hui (Chung Hui, 225–264 C.E.) in Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy |
title_fullStr |
Zhong Hui (Chung Hui, 225–264 C.E.) in Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy |
title_full_unstemmed |
Zhong Hui (Chung Hui, 225–264 C.E.) in Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy |
title_sort |
zhong hui (chung hui, 225–264 c.e.) in internet encyclopedia of philosophy |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2007 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cis_research/311 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/cis_research/article/1310/viewcontent/Zhong_Hui.pdf |
_version_ |
1831146579014189056 |