Zhong Hui (Chung Hui, 225–264 C.E.) in Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy

Zhong Hui (Chung Hui) was a major philosophical figure during China’s early medieval period (220-589 CE). An accomplished interpreter of the Laozi and the Yijing, Zhong Hui contributed significantly to the early development of xuanxue—literally “learning” (xue) of the “dark” or “mysterious” (xuan) D...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: CHAN, Alan Kam Leung
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2007
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cis_research/311
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/cis_research/article/1310/viewcontent/Zhong_Hui.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.cis_research-1310
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.cis_research-13102025-04-24T16:56:10Z Zhong Hui (Chung Hui, 225–264 C.E.) in Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy CHAN, Alan Kam Leung Zhong Hui (Chung Hui) was a major philosophical figure during China’s early medieval period (220-589 CE). An accomplished interpreter of the Laozi and the Yijing, Zhong Hui contributed significantly to the early development of xuanxue—literally “learning” (xue) of the “dark” or “mysterious” (xuan) Dao (“Way”), but sometimes translated as “Neo-Daoism“. He also was a major political figure whose ambition eventually led to his untimely demise. Virtually all of Zhong Hui’s writings have been lost, which perhaps explains why he has been given scant attention by students of Chinese philosophy. Had he not failed in his attempt to overthrow the regime of his day, no doubt his writings would have been preserved and given the attention they justly deserve. In particular, his views on human “capacity and nature” (caixing), as developed in his interpretation of the Laozi, are major contributions to xuanxue philosophy, which dominated the Chinese intellectual scene from the third to the sixth century CE. In contrast to other thinkers of the time, who argued that capacity and nature are the same (tong), different (yi), or diverge from one another (li), Zhong Hui argued that they coincide (he). In effect, he proposed that what is endowed is potential, which must be carefully nurtured and brought to completion through learning and effort. While one’s native endowment is not sufficient, one must have some material to begin with in order to achieve the desired result. Thus, it cannot be said that the latter has nothing to do with the former. 2007-06-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cis_research/311 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/cis_research/article/1310/viewcontent/Zhong_Hui.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection College of Integrative Studies eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Asian Studies Philosophy
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Asian Studies
Philosophy
spellingShingle Asian Studies
Philosophy
CHAN, Alan Kam Leung
Zhong Hui (Chung Hui, 225–264 C.E.) in Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
description Zhong Hui (Chung Hui) was a major philosophical figure during China’s early medieval period (220-589 CE). An accomplished interpreter of the Laozi and the Yijing, Zhong Hui contributed significantly to the early development of xuanxue—literally “learning” (xue) of the “dark” or “mysterious” (xuan) Dao (“Way”), but sometimes translated as “Neo-Daoism“. He also was a major political figure whose ambition eventually led to his untimely demise. Virtually all of Zhong Hui’s writings have been lost, which perhaps explains why he has been given scant attention by students of Chinese philosophy. Had he not failed in his attempt to overthrow the regime of his day, no doubt his writings would have been preserved and given the attention they justly deserve. In particular, his views on human “capacity and nature” (caixing), as developed in his interpretation of the Laozi, are major contributions to xuanxue philosophy, which dominated the Chinese intellectual scene from the third to the sixth century CE. In contrast to other thinkers of the time, who argued that capacity and nature are the same (tong), different (yi), or diverge from one another (li), Zhong Hui argued that they coincide (he). In effect, he proposed that what is endowed is potential, which must be carefully nurtured and brought to completion through learning and effort. While one’s native endowment is not sufficient, one must have some material to begin with in order to achieve the desired result. Thus, it cannot be said that the latter has nothing to do with the former.
format text
author CHAN, Alan Kam Leung
author_facet CHAN, Alan Kam Leung
author_sort CHAN, Alan Kam Leung
title Zhong Hui (Chung Hui, 225–264 C.E.) in Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
title_short Zhong Hui (Chung Hui, 225–264 C.E.) in Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
title_full Zhong Hui (Chung Hui, 225–264 C.E.) in Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
title_fullStr Zhong Hui (Chung Hui, 225–264 C.E.) in Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
title_full_unstemmed Zhong Hui (Chung Hui, 225–264 C.E.) in Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
title_sort zhong hui (chung hui, 225–264 c.e.) in internet encyclopedia of philosophy
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2007
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cis_research/311
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/cis_research/article/1310/viewcontent/Zhong_Hui.pdf
_version_ 1831146579014189056