A dialectic perspective on innovation: Conflicting demands, multiple pathways, and ambidexterity

Innovation, the development and intentional introduction of new and useful ideas by individuals, teams, and organizations, lies at the heart of human adaptation. Decades of research in different disciplines and at different organizational levels have produced a wealth of knowledge about how innovati...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: BLEDOW, Ronald, FRESE, Michael, ANDERSON, Neil, EREZ, Miriam, FARR, James
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/3649
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/4648/viewcontent/a_dialectic_perspective_on_innovation_conflicting_demands_multiple_pathways_and_ambidexterity.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-4648
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-46482024-10-29T01:50:22Z A dialectic perspective on innovation: Conflicting demands, multiple pathways, and ambidexterity BLEDOW, Ronald FRESE, Michael ANDERSON, Neil EREZ, Miriam FARR, James Innovation, the development and intentional introduction of new and useful ideas by individuals, teams, and organizations, lies at the heart of human adaptation. Decades of research in different disciplines and at different organizational levels have produced a wealth of knowledge about how innovation emerges and the factors that facilitate and inhibit innovation. We propose that this knowledge needs integration. In an initial step toward this goal, we apply a dialectic perspective on innovation to overcome limitations of dichotomous reasoning and to gain a more valid account of innovation. We point out that individuals, teams, and organizations need to self-regulate and manage conflicting demands of innovation and that multiple pathways can lead to idea generation and innovation. By scrutinizing the current use of the concept of organizational ambidexterity and extending it to individuals and teams, we develop a framework to help guide and facilitate future research and practice. Readers expecting specific and universal prescriptions of how to innovate will be disappointed as current research does not allow such inferences. Rather, we think innovation research should focus on developing and testing principles of innovation management in addition to developing decision aids for organizational practice. To this end, we put forward key propositions and action principles of innovation management. 2009-09-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/3649 info:doi/10.1111/j.1754-9434.2009.01154.x https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/4648/viewcontent/a_dialectic_perspective_on_innovation_conflicting_demands_multiple_pathways_and_ambidexterity.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Organizational Behavior and Theory Psychology Technology and Innovation
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Organizational Behavior and Theory
Psychology
Technology and Innovation
spellingShingle Organizational Behavior and Theory
Psychology
Technology and Innovation
BLEDOW, Ronald
FRESE, Michael
ANDERSON, Neil
EREZ, Miriam
FARR, James
A dialectic perspective on innovation: Conflicting demands, multiple pathways, and ambidexterity
description Innovation, the development and intentional introduction of new and useful ideas by individuals, teams, and organizations, lies at the heart of human adaptation. Decades of research in different disciplines and at different organizational levels have produced a wealth of knowledge about how innovation emerges and the factors that facilitate and inhibit innovation. We propose that this knowledge needs integration. In an initial step toward this goal, we apply a dialectic perspective on innovation to overcome limitations of dichotomous reasoning and to gain a more valid account of innovation. We point out that individuals, teams, and organizations need to self-regulate and manage conflicting demands of innovation and that multiple pathways can lead to idea generation and innovation. By scrutinizing the current use of the concept of organizational ambidexterity and extending it to individuals and teams, we develop a framework to help guide and facilitate future research and practice. Readers expecting specific and universal prescriptions of how to innovate will be disappointed as current research does not allow such inferences. Rather, we think innovation research should focus on developing and testing principles of innovation management in addition to developing decision aids for organizational practice. To this end, we put forward key propositions and action principles of innovation management.
format text
author BLEDOW, Ronald
FRESE, Michael
ANDERSON, Neil
EREZ, Miriam
FARR, James
author_facet BLEDOW, Ronald
FRESE, Michael
ANDERSON, Neil
EREZ, Miriam
FARR, James
author_sort BLEDOW, Ronald
title A dialectic perspective on innovation: Conflicting demands, multiple pathways, and ambidexterity
title_short A dialectic perspective on innovation: Conflicting demands, multiple pathways, and ambidexterity
title_full A dialectic perspective on innovation: Conflicting demands, multiple pathways, and ambidexterity
title_fullStr A dialectic perspective on innovation: Conflicting demands, multiple pathways, and ambidexterity
title_full_unstemmed A dialectic perspective on innovation: Conflicting demands, multiple pathways, and ambidexterity
title_sort dialectic perspective on innovation: conflicting demands, multiple pathways, and ambidexterity
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2009
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/3649
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/4648/viewcontent/a_dialectic_perspective_on_innovation_conflicting_demands_multiple_pathways_and_ambidexterity.pdf
_version_ 1814777823057936384