A dialectic perspective on innovation: Conflicting demands, multiple pathways, and ambidexterity
Innovation, the development and intentional introduction of new and useful ideas by individuals, teams, and organizations, lies at the heart of human adaptation. Decades of research in different disciplines and at different organizational levels have produced a wealth of knowledge about how innovati...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2009
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/3649 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/4648/viewcontent/a_dialectic_perspective_on_innovation_conflicting_demands_multiple_pathways_and_ambidexterity.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-4648 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-46482024-10-29T01:50:22Z A dialectic perspective on innovation: Conflicting demands, multiple pathways, and ambidexterity BLEDOW, Ronald FRESE, Michael ANDERSON, Neil EREZ, Miriam FARR, James Innovation, the development and intentional introduction of new and useful ideas by individuals, teams, and organizations, lies at the heart of human adaptation. Decades of research in different disciplines and at different organizational levels have produced a wealth of knowledge about how innovation emerges and the factors that facilitate and inhibit innovation. We propose that this knowledge needs integration. In an initial step toward this goal, we apply a dialectic perspective on innovation to overcome limitations of dichotomous reasoning and to gain a more valid account of innovation. We point out that individuals, teams, and organizations need to self-regulate and manage conflicting demands of innovation and that multiple pathways can lead to idea generation and innovation. By scrutinizing the current use of the concept of organizational ambidexterity and extending it to individuals and teams, we develop a framework to help guide and facilitate future research and practice. Readers expecting specific and universal prescriptions of how to innovate will be disappointed as current research does not allow such inferences. Rather, we think innovation research should focus on developing and testing principles of innovation management in addition to developing decision aids for organizational practice. To this end, we put forward key propositions and action principles of innovation management. 2009-09-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/3649 info:doi/10.1111/j.1754-9434.2009.01154.x https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/4648/viewcontent/a_dialectic_perspective_on_innovation_conflicting_demands_multiple_pathways_and_ambidexterity.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Organizational Behavior and Theory Psychology Technology and Innovation |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
Organizational Behavior and Theory Psychology Technology and Innovation |
spellingShingle |
Organizational Behavior and Theory Psychology Technology and Innovation BLEDOW, Ronald FRESE, Michael ANDERSON, Neil EREZ, Miriam FARR, James A dialectic perspective on innovation: Conflicting demands, multiple pathways, and ambidexterity |
description |
Innovation, the development and intentional introduction of new and useful ideas by individuals, teams, and organizations, lies at the heart of human adaptation. Decades of research in different disciplines and at different organizational levels have produced a wealth of knowledge about how innovation emerges and the factors that facilitate and inhibit innovation. We propose that this knowledge needs integration. In an initial step toward this goal, we apply a dialectic perspective on innovation to overcome limitations of dichotomous reasoning and to gain a more valid account of innovation. We point out that individuals, teams, and organizations need to self-regulate and manage conflicting demands of innovation and that multiple pathways can lead to idea generation and innovation. By scrutinizing the current use of the concept of organizational ambidexterity and extending it to individuals and teams, we develop a framework to help guide and facilitate future research and practice. Readers expecting specific and universal prescriptions of how to innovate will be disappointed as current research does not allow such inferences. Rather, we think innovation research should focus on developing and testing principles of innovation management in addition to developing decision aids for organizational practice. To this end, we put forward key propositions and action principles of innovation management. |
format |
text |
author |
BLEDOW, Ronald FRESE, Michael ANDERSON, Neil EREZ, Miriam FARR, James |
author_facet |
BLEDOW, Ronald FRESE, Michael ANDERSON, Neil EREZ, Miriam FARR, James |
author_sort |
BLEDOW, Ronald |
title |
A dialectic perspective on innovation: Conflicting demands, multiple pathways, and ambidexterity |
title_short |
A dialectic perspective on innovation: Conflicting demands, multiple pathways, and ambidexterity |
title_full |
A dialectic perspective on innovation: Conflicting demands, multiple pathways, and ambidexterity |
title_fullStr |
A dialectic perspective on innovation: Conflicting demands, multiple pathways, and ambidexterity |
title_full_unstemmed |
A dialectic perspective on innovation: Conflicting demands, multiple pathways, and ambidexterity |
title_sort |
dialectic perspective on innovation: conflicting demands, multiple pathways, and ambidexterity |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2009 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/3649 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/4648/viewcontent/a_dialectic_perspective_on_innovation_conflicting_demands_multiple_pathways_and_ambidexterity.pdf |
_version_ |
1814777823057936384 |