Statute and Public Policy in Private International Law: Gambling Contracts and Foreign Judgments
This note argues that because there is a legal distinction between the public policy defence to the enforcement of foreign judgments under the common law and the corresponding defence in the Reciprocal Enforcement of Commonwealth Judgments Act, the prohibition against the enforcement of foreign wage...
Saved in:
| 主要作者: | |
|---|---|
| 格式: | text |
| 語言: | English |
| 出版: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2005
|
| 主題: | |
| 在線閱讀: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/760 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/1759/viewcontent/StatutePublicPolicyPrivateIntLaw_2005_SYBIL_pv_oa.pdf |
| 標簽: |
添加標簽
沒有標簽, 成為第一個標記此記錄!
|
| 總結: | This note argues that because there is a legal distinction between the public policy defence to the enforcement of foreign judgments under the common law and the corresponding defence in the Reciprocal Enforcement of Commonwealth Judgments Act, the prohibition against the enforcement of foreign wagering transactions under Singapore law is no longer founded on public policy. |
|---|