Re-assessing the evidentiary regime of the International Court of Justice: A case for codifying its discretion to exclude evidence
Like many international tribunals, the International Court of Justice subscribes heavily to the principle of free admissibility of evidence. Neither its statute nor rules impose substantive restrictions on the admissibility of evidence, whether by way of exclusionary rules or an exclusionary discret...
Saved in:
Main Author: | CHEN, Siyuan |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2015
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/1776 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/3728/viewcontent/Re_assessingEvidentiaryRegimeICJ_2015.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
Similar Items
-
The Judicial Discretion to Exclude Relevant Evidence: Perspectives from an Indian Evidence Act Jurisdiction
by: CHEN, Siyuan
Published: (2012) -
Redefining Relevancy and Exclusionary Discretion in Sir James Fitzjames Stephen’s Indian Evidence Act of 1872: The Singapore Experiment and Lessons for Other Indian Evidence Act Jurisdictions
by: CHEN, Siyuan
Published: (2014) -
'In the Interests of Justice' as the New Test to Exclude Relevant Evidence in Singapore: ANB v ANC [2014] SGHC 172; Wan Lai Ting v Kea Kah Kim [2014] SGHC 180
by: CHEN, Siyuan
Published: (2015) -
Expert Evidence and the Ultimate Issue Rule
by: CHEN, Siyuan
Published: (2011) -
A Common Law View of Causation, Science and Statistical Evidence in the Courtroom
by: BITAS, Basil C.
Published: (2011)