Death Stings Back: A Reply to Sorensen's "The Cheated God"
Lucretius argues that death does not harm the person who dies. Harm could occur only if a person’s future non-existence were harmful. But one’s future non-existence is no more harmful than one’s non-existence prior to being born. Since a person is not harmed by lacking existence prior to being born,...
Saved in:
Main Author: | NOWACKI, Mark |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2005
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/61 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
Similar Items
-
Death Stings Back: A Reply to Sorensen's 'the Cheated God'
by: NOWACKI, Mark
Published: (2005) -
Death Stings Back: A Reply to Sorensen
by: NOWACKI, Mark
Published: (2006) -
How to Prove the Existence of God from the Necessary Finitude of the Past
by: NOWACKI, Mark
Published: (2000) -
The Kalam Cosmological Argument for God
by: NOWACKI, Mark
Published: (2007) -
Intrinsically good like god, extrinsically good by god
by: Chee, Yong Qing
Published: (2023)