A comparison between 50 mcg oral misoprostol every 4 hours and 6 hours for labor induction: A prospective randomized controlled trial

Objective: To compare the effectiveness and safety between 50 mcg oral misoprostol every 4 hours and 6 hours for labor induction. Design: A procpecdive randomized controlled trial. Setting: Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand. S...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pongsatha S., Tongsong T., Somsak T.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2014
Online Access:http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0035682621&partnerID=40&md5=3abeb62176f2dcbdcfb5986e4a3b1bb5
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11759980
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/2638
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Chiang Mai University
Language: English
id th-cmuir.6653943832-2638
record_format dspace
spelling th-cmuir.6653943832-26382014-08-30T02:25:11Z A comparison between 50 mcg oral misoprostol every 4 hours and 6 hours for labor induction: A prospective randomized controlled trial Pongsatha S. Tongsong T. Somsak T. Objective: To compare the effectiveness and safety between 50 mcg oral misoprostol every 4 hours and 6 hours for labor induction. Design: A procpecdive randomized controlled trial. Setting: Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand. Subjects: Eighty nine pregnant women of at least 34 weeks' gestation with indications for labor induction in the condition of unfavourable cervix (Bishop score ≤ 4) and no contraindication to prostaglandin therapy. Interventions: All pregnant women were randomized to receive either 50 mcg misoprostol orally every 4 hours or 6 hours. Main Outcome Measures: Treatment interval from induction to vaginal delivery, matebnal and neonatal complication. Results: The mean treatment intervals from induction to vaginal delivery were 22.10 ± 18.49 hours and 20.91 ± 11.98 hours in the misoprostol group every 4 hours and 6 hours, respectively. The treatment intervals between the two groups were not statistically significant. There was also no significant difference between both groups with regard to maternal and neonatal complications. Conclusion: The effectiveness in terms of treatment interval from induction to vaginal delivery were comparable between the two groups, but administration of misoprostol every 6 hours was found to have a slightly shorter interval, although it did not reach statistical significance. No serious maternal and neonatal complication was demonstrated in both groups. Either regimen in this study can be an alternative for labor induction. 2014-08-30T02:25:11Z 2014-08-30T02:25:11Z 2001 Article 01252208 11759980 JMTHB http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0035682621&partnerID=40&md5=3abeb62176f2dcbdcfb5986e4a3b1bb5 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11759980 http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/2638 English
institution Chiang Mai University
building Chiang Mai University Library
country Thailand
collection CMU Intellectual Repository
language English
description Objective: To compare the effectiveness and safety between 50 mcg oral misoprostol every 4 hours and 6 hours for labor induction. Design: A procpecdive randomized controlled trial. Setting: Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand. Subjects: Eighty nine pregnant women of at least 34 weeks' gestation with indications for labor induction in the condition of unfavourable cervix (Bishop score ≤ 4) and no contraindication to prostaglandin therapy. Interventions: All pregnant women were randomized to receive either 50 mcg misoprostol orally every 4 hours or 6 hours. Main Outcome Measures: Treatment interval from induction to vaginal delivery, matebnal and neonatal complication. Results: The mean treatment intervals from induction to vaginal delivery were 22.10 ± 18.49 hours and 20.91 ± 11.98 hours in the misoprostol group every 4 hours and 6 hours, respectively. The treatment intervals between the two groups were not statistically significant. There was also no significant difference between both groups with regard to maternal and neonatal complications. Conclusion: The effectiveness in terms of treatment interval from induction to vaginal delivery were comparable between the two groups, but administration of misoprostol every 6 hours was found to have a slightly shorter interval, although it did not reach statistical significance. No serious maternal and neonatal complication was demonstrated in both groups. Either regimen in this study can be an alternative for labor induction.
format Article
author Pongsatha S.
Tongsong T.
Somsak T.
spellingShingle Pongsatha S.
Tongsong T.
Somsak T.
A comparison between 50 mcg oral misoprostol every 4 hours and 6 hours for labor induction: A prospective randomized controlled trial
author_facet Pongsatha S.
Tongsong T.
Somsak T.
author_sort Pongsatha S.
title A comparison between 50 mcg oral misoprostol every 4 hours and 6 hours for labor induction: A prospective randomized controlled trial
title_short A comparison between 50 mcg oral misoprostol every 4 hours and 6 hours for labor induction: A prospective randomized controlled trial
title_full A comparison between 50 mcg oral misoprostol every 4 hours and 6 hours for labor induction: A prospective randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr A comparison between 50 mcg oral misoprostol every 4 hours and 6 hours for labor induction: A prospective randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed A comparison between 50 mcg oral misoprostol every 4 hours and 6 hours for labor induction: A prospective randomized controlled trial
title_sort comparison between 50 mcg oral misoprostol every 4 hours and 6 hours for labor induction: a prospective randomized controlled trial
publishDate 2014
url http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0035682621&partnerID=40&md5=3abeb62176f2dcbdcfb5986e4a3b1bb5
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11759980
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/2638
_version_ 1681419896423972864