Biomechanical influence of TKA designs with varying radii on bilateral TKA patients during sit-to-stand

Background. Compared to the design of a traditional multi-radius (MR) total knee arthroplasty (TKA), the single-radius (SR) implant investigated has a fixed flexion/extension center of rotation. The biomechanical effectiveness of an SR for functional daily activities, i.e., sit-to-stand, is not well...

全面介紹

Saved in:
書目詳細資料
Main Authors: He Wang, Kathy J. Simpson, Samatchai Chamnongkich, Tracy Kinsey, Ormonde M. Mahoney
格式: 雜誌
出版: 2018
主題:
在線閱讀:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=50649115933&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/60596
標簽: 添加標簽
沒有標簽, 成為第一個標記此記錄!
機構: Chiang Mai University
實物特徵
總結:Background. Compared to the design of a traditional multi-radius (MR) total knee arthroplasty (TKA), the single-radius (SR) implant investigated has a fixed flexion/extension center of rotation. The biomechanical effectiveness of an SR for functional daily activities, i.e., sit-to-stand, is not well understood. The purpose of the study was to compare the biomechanics underlying functional performance of the sit-to-stand (STS) movement between the limbs containing an MR and an SR TKA of bilateral TKA participants. Methods. Sagittal plane kinematics and kinetics, and EMG data for selected knee flexor and extensor muscles were analyzed for eight bilateral TKA patients, each with an SR and an MR TKA implant. Results. Compared to the MR limb, the SR limb demonstrated greater peak antero-posterior (AP) ground reaction force, higher AP ground reaction impulse, less vastus lateralis and semitendinosus EMG during the forward-thrust phase of the STS movement. No significant difference of knee extensor moment was found between the two knees. Conclusion. Some GRF and EMG differences were evident between the MR and SR limbs during STS movement. Compensatory adaptations may be used to perform the STS. © 2008 Wang et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.