COMPARATIVE STUDY ON SOFT SOIL IMPROVEMENT DESIGN BY USING PREFABRICATED VERTICAL DRAIN WITH GEOTECHNICAL INSTRUMENTATION CASE STUDY RESIDUAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING PROJECT PT. PERTAMINA REFINERY UNIT IV CILACAP

Every single infrastructure development activity is implemented on the ground. However, it is frequently encountered soil with poor conditions on some construction sites. This kind of soil has a low bearing capacity and a huge tendency to subside when being subjected to a certain load. This phenomen...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: ADJANI (NIM : 15009026), ALYSSA
Format: Final Project
Language:Indonesia
Online Access:https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/20994
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Institut Teknologi Bandung
Language: Indonesia
id id-itb.:20994
spelling id-itb.:209942017-11-09T10:52:55ZCOMPARATIVE STUDY ON SOFT SOIL IMPROVEMENT DESIGN BY USING PREFABRICATED VERTICAL DRAIN WITH GEOTECHNICAL INSTRUMENTATION CASE STUDY RESIDUAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING PROJECT PT. PERTAMINA REFINERY UNIT IV CILACAP ADJANI (NIM : 15009026), ALYSSA Indonesia Final Project INSTITUT TEKNOLOGI BANDUNG https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/20994 Every single infrastructure development activity is implemented on the ground. However, it is frequently encountered soil with poor conditions on some construction sites. This kind of soil has a low bearing capacity and a huge tendency to subside when being subjected to a certain load. This phenomenon becomes a serious problem since the soil must be able to withstand the ultimate given load, so that the desirable structure can stand firmly without experiencing any significant post-construction settlement. There are many ways that can be carried out on-site to improve the existing soil quality. One of the most popular soft soil improvement methods available nowadays would be the combination between preloading and the usage of synthetic vertical drainage. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> This Final Project emphasizes more on the comparison and analysis on soft soil consolidation settlement that occurs through some different calculation methods. Those settlement calculation methods are performed using one-dimensional Terzaghi method, Finite Element method by using PLAXIS 8.2, and verification by Asaoka method using field geotechnical instrumentation. Field observation data that were obtained in this Final Project include the field settlements from Settlement Plate, pore water pressure generation from Piezometer and lateral ground movement data from Inclinometer. The main source of these data is derived from field investigation and geotechnical instrumentation of the Residual Fluid Catalytic Cracking project in Cilacap, Central Java. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> The comparison shows that, with a same load and PVD spacing, the predicted settlement calculations by using Terzaghi method, PLAXIS 8.2, and Asaoka method produce different soil settlement values for a certain Area. The generated differences are solely caused by different principles applied in calculations for each method used. Terzaghi method only takes into account the vertical deformation that is based on the principle of one-dimensional consolidation. In addition to manual calculation, it is assumed that the designed load is considered as a distributed load. PLAXIS 8.2 calculates horizontal and vertical deformations by using 3-dimensional Biot consolidation theory, while the Asaoka method considers the three-dimensional consolidation based on the actual data obtained from the field. text
institution Institut Teknologi Bandung
building Institut Teknologi Bandung Library
continent Asia
country Indonesia
Indonesia
content_provider Institut Teknologi Bandung
collection Digital ITB
language Indonesia
description Every single infrastructure development activity is implemented on the ground. However, it is frequently encountered soil with poor conditions on some construction sites. This kind of soil has a low bearing capacity and a huge tendency to subside when being subjected to a certain load. This phenomenon becomes a serious problem since the soil must be able to withstand the ultimate given load, so that the desirable structure can stand firmly without experiencing any significant post-construction settlement. There are many ways that can be carried out on-site to improve the existing soil quality. One of the most popular soft soil improvement methods available nowadays would be the combination between preloading and the usage of synthetic vertical drainage. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> This Final Project emphasizes more on the comparison and analysis on soft soil consolidation settlement that occurs through some different calculation methods. Those settlement calculation methods are performed using one-dimensional Terzaghi method, Finite Element method by using PLAXIS 8.2, and verification by Asaoka method using field geotechnical instrumentation. Field observation data that were obtained in this Final Project include the field settlements from Settlement Plate, pore water pressure generation from Piezometer and lateral ground movement data from Inclinometer. The main source of these data is derived from field investigation and geotechnical instrumentation of the Residual Fluid Catalytic Cracking project in Cilacap, Central Java. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> The comparison shows that, with a same load and PVD spacing, the predicted settlement calculations by using Terzaghi method, PLAXIS 8.2, and Asaoka method produce different soil settlement values for a certain Area. The generated differences are solely caused by different principles applied in calculations for each method used. Terzaghi method only takes into account the vertical deformation that is based on the principle of one-dimensional consolidation. In addition to manual calculation, it is assumed that the designed load is considered as a distributed load. PLAXIS 8.2 calculates horizontal and vertical deformations by using 3-dimensional Biot consolidation theory, while the Asaoka method considers the three-dimensional consolidation based on the actual data obtained from the field.
format Final Project
author ADJANI (NIM : 15009026), ALYSSA
spellingShingle ADJANI (NIM : 15009026), ALYSSA
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON SOFT SOIL IMPROVEMENT DESIGN BY USING PREFABRICATED VERTICAL DRAIN WITH GEOTECHNICAL INSTRUMENTATION CASE STUDY RESIDUAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING PROJECT PT. PERTAMINA REFINERY UNIT IV CILACAP
author_facet ADJANI (NIM : 15009026), ALYSSA
author_sort ADJANI (NIM : 15009026), ALYSSA
title COMPARATIVE STUDY ON SOFT SOIL IMPROVEMENT DESIGN BY USING PREFABRICATED VERTICAL DRAIN WITH GEOTECHNICAL INSTRUMENTATION CASE STUDY RESIDUAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING PROJECT PT. PERTAMINA REFINERY UNIT IV CILACAP
title_short COMPARATIVE STUDY ON SOFT SOIL IMPROVEMENT DESIGN BY USING PREFABRICATED VERTICAL DRAIN WITH GEOTECHNICAL INSTRUMENTATION CASE STUDY RESIDUAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING PROJECT PT. PERTAMINA REFINERY UNIT IV CILACAP
title_full COMPARATIVE STUDY ON SOFT SOIL IMPROVEMENT DESIGN BY USING PREFABRICATED VERTICAL DRAIN WITH GEOTECHNICAL INSTRUMENTATION CASE STUDY RESIDUAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING PROJECT PT. PERTAMINA REFINERY UNIT IV CILACAP
title_fullStr COMPARATIVE STUDY ON SOFT SOIL IMPROVEMENT DESIGN BY USING PREFABRICATED VERTICAL DRAIN WITH GEOTECHNICAL INSTRUMENTATION CASE STUDY RESIDUAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING PROJECT PT. PERTAMINA REFINERY UNIT IV CILACAP
title_full_unstemmed COMPARATIVE STUDY ON SOFT SOIL IMPROVEMENT DESIGN BY USING PREFABRICATED VERTICAL DRAIN WITH GEOTECHNICAL INSTRUMENTATION CASE STUDY RESIDUAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING PROJECT PT. PERTAMINA REFINERY UNIT IV CILACAP
title_sort comparative study on soft soil improvement design by using prefabricated vertical drain with geotechnical instrumentation case study residual fluid catalytic cracking project pt. pertamina refinery unit iv cilacap
url https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/20994
_version_ 1821120326103203840