ACQUISITION EFFECT TOWARDS VALUE OF THE SUBSIDIARY FIRMS: STUDY OF HOLDING STRATEGY BETWEEN PERUM PERHUTANI & PT. INHUTANI I-V
Indonesia as one of the large forest country in the world must be supported by a strong <br /> <br /> forestry business sector to maintain the industry existence. However, in reality, there <br /> <br /> still exist the forestry companies that have unhealthy financial perform...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Final Project |
Language: | Indonesia |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/21204 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
Summary: | Indonesia as one of the large forest country in the world must be supported by a strong <br />
<br />
forestry business sector to maintain the industry existence. However, in reality, there <br />
<br />
still exist the forestry companies that have unhealthy financial performance based on <br />
<br />
the standard of Minister for State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs). Then at the end of 2014, <br />
<br />
the Indonesian government held a holding strategy between several SOEs companies, <br />
<br />
which then acquisationed PT. Inhutani I-V as a subsidiary of Perum Perhutani. This <br />
<br />
strategy has an objective to improve the corporate value of subsidiaries, especially those <br />
<br />
who have poor financial performance records. This research is then intended to <br />
<br />
investigate whether the holding strategy is successful in achieving its main objective or <br />
<br />
not by comparing the value of the subsidiary firms in two year before (2013-2014) and <br />
<br />
after the acquisition (2015-2016). The method used in this research is Discounted Cash <br />
<br />
Flow and Enterprise Value Analysis to calculate the value of a subsidiary. Then it <br />
<br />
continued with Difference-in-Difference Analysis to know the significance of the parent <br />
<br />
role of the company to change the value of subsidiary after the acquisition. The result of <br />
<br />
analysis shows that the change of subsidiary value after acquisition tends to fluctuate on <br />
<br />
DCF method result and tends to increase in some subsidiary on EV analysis result. <br />
<br />
Then, on the difference-in-difference analysis shows that there is no sign of the parent <br />
<br />
role of the company to change the value of subsidiary after the acquisition. The result of <br />
<br />
this study can be used to be an evaluation for the parties involved in the acquisition of <br />
<br />
this strategy, including the government as a holding organizer. |
---|