AN ASSESMENT OF PERFORMANCE AND STRATEGY OF SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT DIVISION TO OPTIMIZE SERVICE LEVEL BY USING THE BALANCED SCORECARD METHOD IN PT FREEPORT INDONESIA
Current Supply Inventory to be most critical issue in entire world wide of PT. Freeport Indonesia. During <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> March 2016 to February 2017, average of reservation which cannot fulfill by Supply Chain Management is <br /> <br /> <b...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Theses |
Language: | Indonesia |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/21402 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
Summary: | Current Supply Inventory to be most critical issue in entire world wide of PT. Freeport Indonesia. During <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
March 2016 to February 2017, average of reservation which cannot fulfill by Supply Chain Management is <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
about 81.22 % with value $ 89, 84 million. In line with that, the Balanced Scorecard method as one of <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Performance Measurement System is used to assess current Performance and Strategy of Supply Chain <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Management, The Objective is from the results gabs obtained, and can give feedback for future improvement <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
strategy, in term of get maximum shareholder value. <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
The last process of supply inventory process is at section warehouse. Service level is used to see how well <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Supply Chain Management fulfill user requirement timely manner. Since 2012, average of service level is <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
below than expected. In this final project taken average of service level starting 1 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
st <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
January 2017 is about 57, 92% of 86 % as targeted service level. <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Using the Balanced Scorecard measurement, resulted six criteria indicator red and three indicator yellow <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
taken for further analysis. Those to be gabs between strategy and existing operation. Then finding 24 root <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
causes after did analysis using Root Causes Analysis three diagram. It then assigned severity index to each <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
root causes to get rank severity for further prioritization business solution and linkage process. Five top of <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
root causes identified for the causes are lack of manpower in PT KPI to be first rank, second rank is <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
overcapacity in warehouse, third rank is high backload plan order, fourth rank is lack of manpower at section <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
inventory control, fith rank is no restriction order for spesific goods and no vendor hold stock for super fast <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
and fast moving item. And the lowest /the last rank is reservation cancelled by warehouse supervisor. After <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
identify some root causes, the solutions for the problems were involving four aspects; communication / <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
coordination, People /Human Resources, Infrastructure, and Business Process. <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Advantages of the proposed business solutions are get more space for storage goods, in short term period get <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
outsourcing employee to operate truck in PT KPI, Get two additional manpower at section inventory control, <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
no quota quantity reservation for ordering, specific item restricted (only dedicated planner can order it), 6314 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
superfast item is on review for vendor hold stock program, reengineering of process issuance material can <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
increase percentage of service level and regular communication/coordination can accommodate all of end <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
user requirement (for more detail depicted in table 4-3 and 4- 4). On implementation plan, 16 of 21 proposed <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
solution (figure 4-1) will prioritize as those has low complexity but has high impact or influence to service <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
level. As Conclusion, inefficiency and ineffectiveness in transformation process can be improved with <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
initiatives and result proposed solution was given. In the end will be increasing shareholder value. |
---|