#TITLE_ALTERNATIVE#

• Main Author: Sulaeman (NIM : 13611055), Hidayat
• Format: Final Project
• Language: Indonesia
• Online Access: https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/22449
• Institution: Institut Teknologi Bandung

Every aircraft in the world using FDR for record parameter and data during operational. One from paremeter and data has record engine data such fuel quantity and fuel flow. Boeing 747-400 has engine data like fuel quantity, fuel flow and fuel consumption but ATR 72-600 has fuel quanty and fuel flow. The main topic in this undergraduate thesis is determine fuel consumption at aircraft ATR 72-600 who has parameter and data didn’t appears in record at FDR. Fuel consumption able determine using fuel quantity reduction and for fuel flow using numerical integration method. <br /> <br /> <br /> The fuel consumption using operational in phases of flight. So we need definition phases of flight for convert in algorithm based FDR.The definition phases of flight able determine fuel consumption based fuel flow <br /> <br /> <br /> using trapezoid numerical integration method and simpson numerical integration method. <br /> <br /> <br /> The graph fuel consumption ATR 7-600 must be increase just like Boeing 747-400. There are relationship between fuel quantity, fuel flow, fuel consumption and flight level at graph. <br /> <br /> <br /> The fuel consumption ATR 72-600 according formula at little sampling 1622 kg based trapezoid numerical integration method is 1606.95 kg and simpson numerical integration method is 1608.62 kg. The error occur is 0.93 based trapezoid and 0.83 based simpson ( under 1 %). The error has evaluated between tarpezoid and simpson still acceptable. The fuel consumption able implemantated at route Halim-Matak such phases of flight <br /> <br /> <br /> at take off 9.53 kg, climb 353.02 kg, cruise 1085.83 kg, 116.7 kg, descent 116.7 kg, approach 40 kg and landing 2.71 kg. The fuel ratio for take off 8.216 kg/km, climb 2.027 kg/km, cruise 1.320 kg/km, descent 1.021 kg/km, approach 1.929 kg/km dan landing 2.297 kg/km. <br /> <br /> <br /> The conlusion according little sampling is simpson numerical integration method better than trapezoid numerical integration method because value of error is less. Accuracy of error using is under 1%.