Numerical Study of Three Split-Hopkinson Shear Bar Techniques
Split-Hopkinson Shear Bar Testing is a modification of the high rate-impact test of Split-Hopkinson Pressure Bar. SHSB is now growing with a variety of techniques that are hat-shaped, double-notch, and punch. However, these three techniques have different characteristics although using the same test...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Final Project |
Language: | Indonesia |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/22490 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
id |
id-itb.:22490 |
---|---|
spelling |
id-itb.:224902017-09-27T10:41:07ZNumerical Study of Three Split-Hopkinson Shear Bar Techniques Faizah (NIM : 13113143), Iffah Indonesia Final Project INSTITUT TEKNOLOGI BANDUNG https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/22490 Split-Hopkinson Shear Bar Testing is a modification of the high rate-impact test of Split-Hopkinson Pressure Bar. SHSB is now growing with a variety of techniques that are hat-shaped, double-notch, and punch. However, these three techniques have different characteristics although using the same test specimen material. <br /> <br /> <br /> The main objective of this study is to determine the best and optimal SHSB technique in determining shear stress-shear strain of a material by numerical analysis of finite element method using Abaqus / CAE® software. <br /> <br /> <br /> The finite element modeling is made up of a quarter solid 3D component for hat-shaped and punch techniques, as well as 3D solid half-sections for double-notch techniques. Used striker bar along 300 mm with an initial speed of 10.915 m / s, incident bar 1200 mm, and transmitted bar 1200 mm, with maraging steel material. For the specimen used material T351-2024 Aluminum (AISI Grade 16Ni) and constitutive material model Johnson-Cook. <br /> <br /> <br /> All three test techniques have differences in specimen shape, incident bar, and transmitted bar dimensions. Based on the numerical simulation results, the maximum shear stress of the hat-shaped technique is 247,66 MPa, the final shear strain 64%, and the strain rate 5162 s-1, the punch technique (τ = 181.3 MPa, γ = 34 %, γ = 5239 s-1), and double-notch technique (τ = 250,5 MPa, γ = 69%, γ = 5470 s-1). The double-notch technique was chosen as the most optimal SHSB technique because it has a slope of strain rate about 4.06 and a force error reach 0%. text |
institution |
Institut Teknologi Bandung |
building |
Institut Teknologi Bandung Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Indonesia Indonesia |
content_provider |
Institut Teknologi Bandung |
collection |
Digital ITB |
language |
Indonesia |
description |
Split-Hopkinson Shear Bar Testing is a modification of the high rate-impact test of Split-Hopkinson Pressure Bar. SHSB is now growing with a variety of techniques that are hat-shaped, double-notch, and punch. However, these three techniques have different characteristics although using the same test specimen material. <br />
<br />
<br />
The main objective of this study is to determine the best and optimal SHSB technique in determining shear stress-shear strain of a material by numerical analysis of finite element method using Abaqus / CAE® software. <br />
<br />
<br />
The finite element modeling is made up of a quarter solid 3D component for hat-shaped and punch techniques, as well as 3D solid half-sections for double-notch techniques. Used striker bar along 300 mm with an initial speed of 10.915 m / s, incident bar 1200 mm, and transmitted bar 1200 mm, with maraging steel material. For the specimen used material T351-2024 Aluminum (AISI Grade 16Ni) and constitutive material model Johnson-Cook. <br />
<br />
<br />
All three test techniques have differences in specimen shape, incident bar, and transmitted bar dimensions. Based on the numerical simulation results, the maximum shear stress of the hat-shaped technique is 247,66 MPa, the final shear strain 64%, and the strain rate 5162 s-1, the punch technique (τ = 181.3 MPa, γ = 34 %, γ = 5239 s-1), and double-notch technique (τ = 250,5 MPa, γ = 69%, γ = 5470 s-1). The double-notch technique was chosen as the most optimal SHSB technique because it has a slope of strain rate about 4.06 and a force error reach 0%. |
format |
Final Project |
author |
Faizah (NIM : 13113143), Iffah |
spellingShingle |
Faizah (NIM : 13113143), Iffah Numerical Study of Three Split-Hopkinson Shear Bar Techniques |
author_facet |
Faizah (NIM : 13113143), Iffah |
author_sort |
Faizah (NIM : 13113143), Iffah |
title |
Numerical Study of Three Split-Hopkinson Shear Bar Techniques |
title_short |
Numerical Study of Three Split-Hopkinson Shear Bar Techniques |
title_full |
Numerical Study of Three Split-Hopkinson Shear Bar Techniques |
title_fullStr |
Numerical Study of Three Split-Hopkinson Shear Bar Techniques |
title_full_unstemmed |
Numerical Study of Three Split-Hopkinson Shear Bar Techniques |
title_sort |
numerical study of three split-hopkinson shear bar techniques |
url |
https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/22490 |
_version_ |
1821120788592328704 |