CONVENTIONAL VERSUS SHARIA MICROBANKS EFFICIENCY: CASE FROM WEST JAVA PROVINCE, INDONESIA
Microbanks, whether conventional (Bank Perkreditan Rakyat/BPR) or <br /> <br /> sharia (Bank Perkreditan Rakyat Syariah/BPRS), continue to grow along with the <br /> <br /> development of small and medium business development in general. BPRS in its <br /> <br />...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Final Project |
Language: | Indonesia |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/22660 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
Summary: | Microbanks, whether conventional (Bank Perkreditan Rakyat/BPR) or <br />
<br />
sharia (Bank Perkreditan Rakyat Syariah/BPRS), continue to grow along with the <br />
<br />
development of small and medium business development in general. BPRS in its <br />
<br />
development continues to increase along with the development of sharia economy <br />
<br />
that is increasingly in demand, supported that Indonesia is the country with the <br />
<br />
largest Muslim population in the world. The sharia microbanks or Bank Perkreditan <br />
<br />
Rakyat Syariah (BPRS), it’s profitability levels nationwide showed a trend of data <br />
<br />
continues to increase, from the past years, but the BPR is inversely related to the <br />
<br />
BPRS, which showed a declining trend during the same period, although BPR <br />
<br />
existed beforehand than BPRS. Therefore, in this, the research problem is to study <br />
<br />
differences in efficiency through Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), between the <br />
<br />
conventional microbanks (BPR) and sharia microbanks (BPRS) cases in West Java <br />
<br />
province, as the center of BPR and BPRS development in Indonesia. <br />
<br />
The results revealed that there was no difference in efficiency between BPR <br />
<br />
and BPRS. BPR is not more efficient than the BPRS. Thus, BPRS despite the <br />
<br />
economic scale is smaller than BPR but can achieve the same efficiency as BPR. <br />
<br />
Both types of BPR do not provide the criteria for productivity level. Only in one <br />
<br />
year, BPR and BPRS meet productivity criteria. In aggregate, 3 BPRs meet the <br />
<br />
criteria of productivity change in the total, while the BPRS only two that fulfill <br />
<br />
these criteria. Therefore, BPR basically descriptive better level of productivity <br />
<br />
compared to the BPRS. |
---|