PRODUCTION COST COMPARISON OF METAL PART BETWEEN ADDITIVE AND SUBSTRACTIVE MANUFACTURING AT PT. ADYAWINSA STAMPING INDUSTRIES

PT. Adyawinsa Stamping Industries is a company that runs business processes as a provider of automotive components. Components are manufactured using a stamping process from a material material in the form of sheet metal. But with the development of technology and the concept of Industry 4.0, a new...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: RIFAI - (13413099), MOHAMAD
Format: Final Project
Language:Indonesia
Online Access:https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/23115
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Institut Teknologi Bandung
Language: Indonesia
id id-itb.:23115
spelling id-itb.:231152017-09-27T11:39:11ZPRODUCTION COST COMPARISON OF METAL PART BETWEEN ADDITIVE AND SUBSTRACTIVE MANUFACTURING AT PT. ADYAWINSA STAMPING INDUSTRIES RIFAI - (13413099), MOHAMAD Indonesia Final Project INSTITUT TEKNOLOGI BANDUNG https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/23115 PT. Adyawinsa Stamping Industries is a company that runs business processes as a provider of automotive components. Components are manufactured using a stamping process from a material material in the form of sheet metal. But with the development of technology and the concept of Industry 4.0, a new method in producing a metal component by adding the material instead of reducing the proportion of raw material material. The method is known as Additive Manufacturing (AM), so it raises a question of how effective the use of the AM method is rather than the existing production method, Substractive Manufacturing (SM). <br /> <br /> <br /> Both methods will be compared against each other by using cost parameter and production time indicator. The parameters are used to identify the economic lot point of each method, so that the AM method can be known how big its potential is compared with the SM method. <br /> <br /> <br /> In calculating the AM production time, an estimate is used with the model developed by Li. The production time is then used to calculate the total cost required during the production process. The cost model used also refers to the Li model with some changes with the intention of equating the cost components used in the SM method. <br /> <br /> <br /> The results of the cost comparison of the two methods performed, indicating that the AM method is considered more efficient at low quantity production, with an amount of no more than 185 units. If the time parameter used, then the AM method is considered more effective if the quantity of production does not exceed 5760 units. <br /> text
institution Institut Teknologi Bandung
building Institut Teknologi Bandung Library
continent Asia
country Indonesia
Indonesia
content_provider Institut Teknologi Bandung
collection Digital ITB
language Indonesia
description PT. Adyawinsa Stamping Industries is a company that runs business processes as a provider of automotive components. Components are manufactured using a stamping process from a material material in the form of sheet metal. But with the development of technology and the concept of Industry 4.0, a new method in producing a metal component by adding the material instead of reducing the proportion of raw material material. The method is known as Additive Manufacturing (AM), so it raises a question of how effective the use of the AM method is rather than the existing production method, Substractive Manufacturing (SM). <br /> <br /> <br /> Both methods will be compared against each other by using cost parameter and production time indicator. The parameters are used to identify the economic lot point of each method, so that the AM method can be known how big its potential is compared with the SM method. <br /> <br /> <br /> In calculating the AM production time, an estimate is used with the model developed by Li. The production time is then used to calculate the total cost required during the production process. The cost model used also refers to the Li model with some changes with the intention of equating the cost components used in the SM method. <br /> <br /> <br /> The results of the cost comparison of the two methods performed, indicating that the AM method is considered more efficient at low quantity production, with an amount of no more than 185 units. If the time parameter used, then the AM method is considered more effective if the quantity of production does not exceed 5760 units. <br />
format Final Project
author RIFAI - (13413099), MOHAMAD
spellingShingle RIFAI - (13413099), MOHAMAD
PRODUCTION COST COMPARISON OF METAL PART BETWEEN ADDITIVE AND SUBSTRACTIVE MANUFACTURING AT PT. ADYAWINSA STAMPING INDUSTRIES
author_facet RIFAI - (13413099), MOHAMAD
author_sort RIFAI - (13413099), MOHAMAD
title PRODUCTION COST COMPARISON OF METAL PART BETWEEN ADDITIVE AND SUBSTRACTIVE MANUFACTURING AT PT. ADYAWINSA STAMPING INDUSTRIES
title_short PRODUCTION COST COMPARISON OF METAL PART BETWEEN ADDITIVE AND SUBSTRACTIVE MANUFACTURING AT PT. ADYAWINSA STAMPING INDUSTRIES
title_full PRODUCTION COST COMPARISON OF METAL PART BETWEEN ADDITIVE AND SUBSTRACTIVE MANUFACTURING AT PT. ADYAWINSA STAMPING INDUSTRIES
title_fullStr PRODUCTION COST COMPARISON OF METAL PART BETWEEN ADDITIVE AND SUBSTRACTIVE MANUFACTURING AT PT. ADYAWINSA STAMPING INDUSTRIES
title_full_unstemmed PRODUCTION COST COMPARISON OF METAL PART BETWEEN ADDITIVE AND SUBSTRACTIVE MANUFACTURING AT PT. ADYAWINSA STAMPING INDUSTRIES
title_sort production cost comparison of metal part between additive and substractive manufacturing at pt. adyawinsa stamping industries
url https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/23115
_version_ 1822920774022856704