UNUSUAL MARKET ACTIVITY (UMA) IN INDONESIA STOCK MARKET RETURN PERIOD 2017: BEFORE AND AFTER DIFFERENCES
Unpredictable economic conditions push the stock price volatility issue become <br /> <br /> important among investors. But it is unfortunate that currently the majority of investors <br /> <br /> prefer choosing an investment instrument based on their confidence and market n...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Final Project |
Language: | Indonesia |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/23305 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
Summary: | Unpredictable economic conditions push the stock price volatility issue become <br />
<br />
important among investors. But it is unfortunate that currently the majority of investors <br />
<br />
prefer choosing an investment instrument based on their confidence and market news <br />
<br />
that is currently circulating, not by doing technical or fundamental analysis. Such <br />
<br />
phenomena can be bad for stock market conditions can even lead to financial crisis like <br />
<br />
stock market bubble. Because of that, exchange authorities in Indonesia which is IDX <br />
<br />
(Indonesia Stock Exchange) issued some regulation such as suspend, UMA (Unusual <br />
<br />
Market Activity), and delisting that relate to preventing irrational prices from appearing <br />
<br />
on the stock market and make the market become more inefficient, where in this study <br />
<br />
the author only focusing in UMA regulation. <br />
<br />
One of UMA's few researches in Indonesia is done by (Oriana, 2013) with the sample <br />
<br />
of UMA stocks from 2008 - 2012, it came up with a couple conclusions that are quite <br />
<br />
contrary to each other. First, the purpose of maintaining regular stock trading and <br />
<br />
warning investor by issuing UMA announcement is reached. On the other hand, the <br />
<br />
UMA announcement does not protect investors as actors in the market. Based on that <br />
<br />
research, this study is analyzing the effect of UMA policy in 2017 using descriptive <br />
<br />
analysis, calculating the return, abnormal return (AR), cumulative abnormal return <br />
<br />
(CAR), and paired t-test to analyze the data and interpret the results. The result intended <br />
<br />
that UMA do not have a direct impact and significant difference to stock return. <br />
<br />
Nevertheless, UMA successfully achieved its objective and maintain the abnormal <br />
<br />
return in increased condition with the significant difference around the announcement. <br />
<br />
While in decreased condition, UMA cannot be said has successfully maintain the <br />
<br />
abnormal return directly. |
---|