#TITLE_ALTERNATIVE#
The method to simulate the MMP has been developed throughout the years by various researchers. The simulation methods available these days are slim-tube simulation, method of characteristics, and mixing cell methods. Cell-to-cell and multiple mixing cell constitutes mixing cell method. Even though c...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Final Project |
| Language: | Indonesia |
| Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/23961 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
| Language: | Indonesia |
| Summary: | The method to simulate the MMP has been developed throughout the years by various researchers. The simulation methods available these days are slim-tube simulation, method of characteristics, and mixing cell methods. Cell-to-cell and multiple mixing cell constitutes mixing cell method. Even though cell-to-cell and multiple mixing cell have the same multi-cell simulation, they give different results due to the difference in mixing mechanism employed. Even though the difference has been described very well mathematically by Ahmadi (2011), there is an inadequacy in literatures that describe the difference physically, that is by looking through the molecules involved. By analyzing the difference in value of MMP resulted between the two method, it is concluded that physically the difference is affected by molecular weight, molecular structure, and polarity while not affected by density. |
|---|