EFFECT OF REDUCING WASTE AT SOURCE AND INFORMAL SECTOR IN THE SELECTION OF PROCESSING THERMAL WASTE TECHNOLOGY
Generally, the problem experienced by the cities of medium and large in Indonesia are the problem of solid waste. Many factors led to increased amount of waste. Bandung is one of the cities that have the factors that led to the increasing amount of landfill waste such as: population growth, economic...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Theses |
| Language: | Indonesia |
| Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/24867 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
| Language: | Indonesia |
| Summary: | Generally, the problem experienced by the cities of medium and large in Indonesia are the problem of solid waste. Many factors led to increased amount of waste. Bandung is one of the cities that have the factors that led to the increasing amount of landfill waste such as: population growth, economic growth, high living standards and social behavior. One way to reduce landfill waste by waste reduction at the source and TPS. Waste reduction can also be done by the informal sectors. In order to know how dynamic the amount of waste in accordance with the development and growth of the population in Bandung used method of dynamic system approach using simulations obtained projection waste generated in Bandung by applying various scenarios until the year 2034, so of waste produced can be taken into consideration in calculating eligibility of alternative thermal waste treatment technology. Based on the analysis, waste generated during the simulation have dynamic changes with sensitivity parameters such as per capita waste generation parameters. Before the processed waste piles do technical analysis, to look at the technical feasibility based on the characteristics of the waste. Alternative waste processing technology gasification with the selection criteria be held in the form of financial feasibility Nett present Value of Rp. 1.150.120.593.042, Payback Period 6.7 years and Profitability Index 2,3. |
|---|