A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SUSTAINABLE INFRASTRUCTURE RATING TOOLS
<p align="justify">Construction developments are like two sides of a coin, on one side construction developments are needed to support economic and social growth, but at the other side they’re also one of the biggest contributors of environmental degradation. Sustainable developme...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Theses |
Language: | Indonesia |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/25976 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
id |
id-itb.:25976 |
---|---|
spelling |
id-itb.:259762018-02-19T11:08:53ZA COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SUSTAINABLE INFRASTRUCTURE RATING TOOLS NINGDYA , AYU Teknik sipil Indonesia Theses INSTITUT TEKNOLOGI BANDUNG https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/25976 <p align="justify">Construction developments are like two sides of a coin, on one side construction developments are needed to support economic and social growth, but at the other side they’re also one of the biggest contributors of environmental degradation. Sustainable development is considered as a solution for that challenge, and so this concept is urgently needed to be applied so that the practice of construction become more efficient and environmental-friendly, and then give greater economic, social and environmental benefits. To assess the practice of sustainable development on building infrastructures, then the presence of rating system is needed. Sustainable infrastructure rating system on the other nations already proved as an effective instrument to facilitate stakeholders on making the right decisions to support the realization of sustainable development. Because of that, this research will do a comparison of three (3) sustainable infrastructure rating systems from three (3) different nations, i.e. Infrastructure Sustainability from Australia, Envision from United States, and CEEQUAL from United Kingdom. On this comparison process the conformity of the aspects in those three instruments with Peraturan Menteri Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat Nomor 05/PRT/M/2015 tentang Pedoman Umum Implementasi Konstruksi Berkelanjutan pada Penyelenggaraan Infrastruktur Bidang Pekerjaan Umum dan Permukiman will also be reviewed. The final result of this study is a recommendation or proposal in all sixth aspects to improve sustainable construction-related regulation in Indonesia.<p align="justify"> text |
institution |
Institut Teknologi Bandung |
building |
Institut Teknologi Bandung Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Indonesia Indonesia |
content_provider |
Institut Teknologi Bandung |
collection |
Digital ITB |
language |
Indonesia |
topic |
Teknik sipil |
spellingShingle |
Teknik sipil NINGDYA , AYU A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SUSTAINABLE INFRASTRUCTURE RATING TOOLS |
description |
<p align="justify">Construction developments are like two sides of a coin, on one side construction developments are needed to support economic and social growth, but at the other side they’re also one of the biggest contributors of environmental degradation. Sustainable development is considered as a solution for that challenge, and so this concept is urgently needed to be applied so that the practice of construction become more efficient and environmental-friendly, and then give greater economic, social and environmental benefits. To assess the practice of sustainable development on building infrastructures, then the presence of rating system is needed. Sustainable infrastructure rating system on the other nations already proved as an effective instrument to facilitate stakeholders on making the right decisions to support the realization of sustainable development. Because of that, this research will do a comparison of three (3) sustainable infrastructure rating systems from three (3) different nations, i.e. Infrastructure Sustainability from Australia, Envision from United States, and CEEQUAL from United Kingdom. On this comparison process the conformity of the aspects in those three instruments with Peraturan Menteri Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat Nomor 05/PRT/M/2015 tentang Pedoman Umum Implementasi Konstruksi Berkelanjutan pada Penyelenggaraan Infrastruktur Bidang Pekerjaan Umum dan Permukiman will also be reviewed. The final result of this study is a recommendation or proposal in all sixth aspects to improve sustainable construction-related regulation in Indonesia.<p align="justify"> |
format |
Theses |
author |
NINGDYA , AYU |
author_facet |
NINGDYA , AYU |
author_sort |
NINGDYA , AYU |
title |
A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SUSTAINABLE INFRASTRUCTURE RATING TOOLS |
title_short |
A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SUSTAINABLE INFRASTRUCTURE RATING TOOLS |
title_full |
A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SUSTAINABLE INFRASTRUCTURE RATING TOOLS |
title_fullStr |
A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SUSTAINABLE INFRASTRUCTURE RATING TOOLS |
title_full_unstemmed |
A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SUSTAINABLE INFRASTRUCTURE RATING TOOLS |
title_sort |
comparative study of sustainable infrastructure rating tools |
url |
https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/25976 |
_version_ |
1821910611263488000 |