#TITLE_ALTERNATIVE#

• Main Author: Adi Ramdhani - 15114004 , Fajar
• Format: Final Project
• Language: Indonesia
• Online Access: https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/27111
• Institution: Institut Teknologi Bandung

<p align="justify">Pitch, roll, and yaw transducer’s angle error which exists in MBES system needs to be corrected by determining the value of transducer’s angles using the patch test calibration in EIVA NaviModel software. In the calibration of the patch test, there is a determination of sample size area because not all parts of the lanes in the input can meet the calibration criteria. This research is aimed to compare the impact of using the different sample area with respect to the generated depth model by MBES device type R2Sonic 2020 and Kongsberg M3 constantly adhering to the valid calibration criteria. For gaining those goal, it is necessary to determine three patch test sample sizes, that is wide sample (350 m x 10 m for roll, 700 m x 10m for pitch, 700 m x 10 m for heading), medium sample (150 m x 10 m for roll, 300 m x10 m for pitch, 300 m x 10 m for heading), and small sample (50 m x 10 m for roll, 100 m x10 m for pitch, 100 m x 10 m for heading). Generating DTM must be done after obtaining the value of patch test calibration for each sample size used. After analyzing, it can be concluded that the use of wide sample patch test area (350 m x 10 m for roll, 700 m x10 m for pitch, 700 m x 10 m for heading) can generate a better DTM compared to the medium (150 m x 10 m for roll, 300m x10m for pitch, 300 m x 10 m for heading) and small sample areas (50 m x 10 m for roll, 100m x10 m for pitch, 100 m x 10 m for heading). <p align="justify">