COMPARED STUDY MULTIBODY SYSTEMS DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF LRT CARS.

<p align="justify">Light Rapid Transit (LRT) is a light weight train which hopefully could solve mobility and traffic problems in Indonesia. PT INKA as BUMN which fieald in the railway industry have reponsibility to design LRT that suits people need. In the end of LRT design process,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: ALVIN ANDRIYANTO, FRANSISKUS
Format: Final Project
Language:Indonesia
Subjects:
Online Access:https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/27399
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Institut Teknologi Bandung
Language: Indonesia
id id-itb.:27399
spelling id-itb.:273992018-08-14T13:23:09ZCOMPARED STUDY MULTIBODY SYSTEMS DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF LRT CARS. ALVIN ANDRIYANTO, FRANSISKUS Teknik (Rekayasa, enjinering dan kegiatan berkaitan) Indonesia Final Project INSTITUT TEKNOLOGI BANDUNG https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/27399 <p align="justify">Light Rapid Transit (LRT) is a light weight train which hopefully could solve mobility and traffic problems in Indonesia. PT INKA as BUMN which fieald in the railway industry have reponsibility to design LRT that suits people need. In the end of LRT design process, analysis of LRT is required to ensure that LRT are safe and comfortable enough on its operated condition <br /> <br /> All this time, software that PT INKA used for design process is Universal Mechanism. Along the time, a lot of new software appear in the market. ITB as a techology based university, have a licensed of multibody software SIMPACK. To evaluate SIMPACK, the author performs dynamic analysis using SIMPACK software to be compared with results obtained from UM. Validation of the LRT train model is carried out by static and eigenvalue analysis with theoritical calculation, before performing dynamic analysis. <br /> <br /> Normal force on each wheel has the same value as the theoritical calculations. In addition, the value of the natural frequency on vertial direction is also same with theoritical calculations. Therefore, LRT train modeled is valid for dynamic analysis. Stability evaluation on straight track produces a guidence force below the boundary value although there is a little different with UM value. Likewise, simulation on curving track, SIMPACK produces lateral force value and lateral vertical comparison value which is categorized safe according to Nadal criteria. Comfort is evaluated based on the Sperling Index. Model index value on vertical and lateral direction could be categorized as comfort for all speed ranges because worth below 2,5 (more pronouned but not unpleasant). The difference between SIMPACK and UM results is due to the different properties of force elemen model. <br /> <br /> Based on a lot of things discussed above, SIMPACK has an excellent potential to be used for vehicle multibody system dynamic analysis.<p align="justify"> text
institution Institut Teknologi Bandung
building Institut Teknologi Bandung Library
continent Asia
country Indonesia
Indonesia
content_provider Institut Teknologi Bandung
collection Digital ITB
language Indonesia
topic Teknik (Rekayasa, enjinering dan kegiatan berkaitan)
spellingShingle Teknik (Rekayasa, enjinering dan kegiatan berkaitan)
ALVIN ANDRIYANTO, FRANSISKUS
COMPARED STUDY MULTIBODY SYSTEMS DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF LRT CARS.
description <p align="justify">Light Rapid Transit (LRT) is a light weight train which hopefully could solve mobility and traffic problems in Indonesia. PT INKA as BUMN which fieald in the railway industry have reponsibility to design LRT that suits people need. In the end of LRT design process, analysis of LRT is required to ensure that LRT are safe and comfortable enough on its operated condition <br /> <br /> All this time, software that PT INKA used for design process is Universal Mechanism. Along the time, a lot of new software appear in the market. ITB as a techology based university, have a licensed of multibody software SIMPACK. To evaluate SIMPACK, the author performs dynamic analysis using SIMPACK software to be compared with results obtained from UM. Validation of the LRT train model is carried out by static and eigenvalue analysis with theoritical calculation, before performing dynamic analysis. <br /> <br /> Normal force on each wheel has the same value as the theoritical calculations. In addition, the value of the natural frequency on vertial direction is also same with theoritical calculations. Therefore, LRT train modeled is valid for dynamic analysis. Stability evaluation on straight track produces a guidence force below the boundary value although there is a little different with UM value. Likewise, simulation on curving track, SIMPACK produces lateral force value and lateral vertical comparison value which is categorized safe according to Nadal criteria. Comfort is evaluated based on the Sperling Index. Model index value on vertical and lateral direction could be categorized as comfort for all speed ranges because worth below 2,5 (more pronouned but not unpleasant). The difference between SIMPACK and UM results is due to the different properties of force elemen model. <br /> <br /> Based on a lot of things discussed above, SIMPACK has an excellent potential to be used for vehicle multibody system dynamic analysis.<p align="justify">
format Final Project
author ALVIN ANDRIYANTO, FRANSISKUS
author_facet ALVIN ANDRIYANTO, FRANSISKUS
author_sort ALVIN ANDRIYANTO, FRANSISKUS
title COMPARED STUDY MULTIBODY SYSTEMS DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF LRT CARS.
title_short COMPARED STUDY MULTIBODY SYSTEMS DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF LRT CARS.
title_full COMPARED STUDY MULTIBODY SYSTEMS DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF LRT CARS.
title_fullStr COMPARED STUDY MULTIBODY SYSTEMS DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF LRT CARS.
title_full_unstemmed COMPARED STUDY MULTIBODY SYSTEMS DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF LRT CARS.
title_sort compared study multibody systems dynamic analysis of lrt cars.
url https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/27399
_version_ 1823635725996785664