DISCOURSE ON CONTEMPORARY ART IN INDONESIAN BIENNALES BETWEEN THE YEARS 1993-200
This thesis aims to analyse the process of adopting, articulating, and contextualising the <br /> <br /> discourse of contemporary art through the practice of exhibition making, specifically <br /> <br /> biennale, between the years of 1993 to 2003. The method applied in this...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Theses |
Language: | Indonesia |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/27455 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
Summary: | This thesis aims to analyse the process of adopting, articulating, and contextualising the <br />
<br />
discourse of contemporary art through the practice of exhibition making, specifically <br />
<br />
biennale, between the years of 1993 to 2003. The method applied in this research is <br />
<br />
curatorial studies, an attempt to explore alternate approach towards art history through the <br />
<br />
concept of ‘exhibition histories’. This alternate approach enables this research to widen its <br />
<br />
scope of analysis aside from aesthetic discourse which is already ‘established’ in <br />
<br />
‘conventional’ art history. <br />
<br />
In the early 1990s, the practice of contemporary art was thought of as somewhat <br />
<br />
problematic in Indonesia. This was due to how ‘foreign’ this contemporary discourse was <br />
<br />
and exasperated with insufficient public knowledge. This rendered public to be indifferent <br />
<br />
towards contemporary art: some choose to appreciated and saw its possibilities further as <br />
<br />
demonstrated at Binal Experimental Arts 1992, yet some tended to be critical and nullified <br />
<br />
its significance in Bienalle Seni Rupa Jakarta IX 1993. In advance, contemporary art in <br />
<br />
Indonesia which at first be exercised in the periphery, started to gradually found its <br />
<br />
relevance and basis in Indonesian art, prompted by ‘international artist’ whom at first <br />
<br />
claimed their recognitions and merit in international forum. In national context, biennales <br />
<br />
served as a platform to ‘eased’ the transition and to erected relevant contextualisation of <br />
<br />
contemporary art practice. In retrospect, these attempts started to come into fruition, when <br />
<br />
art mainstream started to embrace its ‘contemporary practice’ and keen to explore further <br />
<br />
possibilities. <br />
<br />
Three biennales were determined to be the primary samples of this research, which are: <br />
<br />
Bienal Seni Rupa Yogyakarta 1999, Bienal Yogyakarta 2003: Countrybution, and CP <br />
<br />
Open Biennale 2003: Interpellation. These biennales are specifically chosen due to their <br />
<br />
specific qualities and prominences in approaching Indonesian contemporary art discourse. <br />
<br />
Through careful examination towards each curatorial performance inherent in these <br />
<br />
biennales, it may well be argued that this format virtually serves as an exposé to recent <br />
<br />
aesthetic innovations towards the first quarter of the 2000s. Methods be utilised in <br />
<br />
exposing these innovations did also range in diversity: BSRY 1999 traced further <br />
<br />
implication after the internationalisation of the 1990s, BY 2003 contextualised recent <br />
<br />
practice to recent sociopolitical context, and CPOB revolving around the issue of ‘the |
---|