DEA EFFICIENCY AND RISK: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ISLAMIC AND CONVENTIONAL BANKS IN INDONESIA

This study examined the efficiency of Islamic and conventional banks in Indonesia and compared the result of efficiency for both banks. The efficiency result will be identified the correlation to risks. Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and intermediation approach are applied to measure the efficiency...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Liana Rahmawati (19015020), Tri
Format: Final Project
Language:Indonesia
Online Access:https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/31371
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Institut Teknologi Bandung
Language: Indonesia
id id-itb.:31371
spelling id-itb.:313712018-07-09T08:11:31ZDEA EFFICIENCY AND RISK: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ISLAMIC AND CONVENTIONAL BANKS IN INDONESIA Liana Rahmawati (19015020), Tri Indonesia Final Project INSTITUT TEKNOLOGI BANDUNG https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/31371 This study examined the efficiency of Islamic and conventional banks in Indonesia and compared the result of efficiency for both banks. The efficiency result will be identified the correlation to risks. Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and intermediation approach are applied to measure the efficiency scores. The measurement of efficiency focus on the output orientation and generate three efficiency result, which are Constant Return to Scale (CRS), Variable Return to Scale (VRS), and scale efficiency. Risk is measured by using bank financial ratios. Spearman correlation is used to observe the correlation between credit risk, liquidity risk, capital risk and efficiency. This study collects data from the Financial Services Authority (FSA or Otoritas Jasa Keungan) for the period 2010 to 2017. The finding of this study shows that the average of CRS, VRS, scale efficiency in conventional banks is higher than the average efficiency in Islamic banks. The Mann-Whitney test revealed that there is a statistically significant difference between the efficiency of Islamic banking and the efficiency of conventional banking. The Spearman’s correlation test indicates that Credit risk and scale efficiency in conventional banks has statistically significant negative correlation, while credit risk and scale efficiency in Islamic commercial banks has statistically significant negative correlation. Liquidity risk and CRS efficiency of conventional banks has statistically significant positive correlation, while Liquidity risk and CRS efficiency in Islamic commercial banks has statistically significant positive correlation. Capital risk and scale efficiency of conventional banks has statistically significant positive correlation, while capital risk and scale efficiency in Islamic commercial banks has statistically significant positive. For future research, a production approach or asset approach can be applied to obtain another insight in examining the correlation between risk and efficiency. text
institution Institut Teknologi Bandung
building Institut Teknologi Bandung Library
continent Asia
country Indonesia
Indonesia
content_provider Institut Teknologi Bandung
collection Digital ITB
language Indonesia
description This study examined the efficiency of Islamic and conventional banks in Indonesia and compared the result of efficiency for both banks. The efficiency result will be identified the correlation to risks. Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and intermediation approach are applied to measure the efficiency scores. The measurement of efficiency focus on the output orientation and generate three efficiency result, which are Constant Return to Scale (CRS), Variable Return to Scale (VRS), and scale efficiency. Risk is measured by using bank financial ratios. Spearman correlation is used to observe the correlation between credit risk, liquidity risk, capital risk and efficiency. This study collects data from the Financial Services Authority (FSA or Otoritas Jasa Keungan) for the period 2010 to 2017. The finding of this study shows that the average of CRS, VRS, scale efficiency in conventional banks is higher than the average efficiency in Islamic banks. The Mann-Whitney test revealed that there is a statistically significant difference between the efficiency of Islamic banking and the efficiency of conventional banking. The Spearman’s correlation test indicates that Credit risk and scale efficiency in conventional banks has statistically significant negative correlation, while credit risk and scale efficiency in Islamic commercial banks has statistically significant negative correlation. Liquidity risk and CRS efficiency of conventional banks has statistically significant positive correlation, while Liquidity risk and CRS efficiency in Islamic commercial banks has statistically significant positive correlation. Capital risk and scale efficiency of conventional banks has statistically significant positive correlation, while capital risk and scale efficiency in Islamic commercial banks has statistically significant positive. For future research, a production approach or asset approach can be applied to obtain another insight in examining the correlation between risk and efficiency.
format Final Project
author Liana Rahmawati (19015020), Tri
spellingShingle Liana Rahmawati (19015020), Tri
DEA EFFICIENCY AND RISK: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ISLAMIC AND CONVENTIONAL BANKS IN INDONESIA
author_facet Liana Rahmawati (19015020), Tri
author_sort Liana Rahmawati (19015020), Tri
title DEA EFFICIENCY AND RISK: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ISLAMIC AND CONVENTIONAL BANKS IN INDONESIA
title_short DEA EFFICIENCY AND RISK: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ISLAMIC AND CONVENTIONAL BANKS IN INDONESIA
title_full DEA EFFICIENCY AND RISK: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ISLAMIC AND CONVENTIONAL BANKS IN INDONESIA
title_fullStr DEA EFFICIENCY AND RISK: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ISLAMIC AND CONVENTIONAL BANKS IN INDONESIA
title_full_unstemmed DEA EFFICIENCY AND RISK: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ISLAMIC AND CONVENTIONAL BANKS IN INDONESIA
title_sort dea efficiency and risk: a comparative study of islamic and conventional banks in indonesia
url https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/31371
_version_ 1822923561034055680