KETERKAITAN TENAGA KERJA INDUSTRI HULLER DENGAN EKONOMI LOKAL STUDI KASUS : 'INDUSTRI HULLER DI DESA BEBERAN KABUPATEN SERANG
The purpose of the study are to identify, to analyze and to predict the link between labor of huller and local economic activity. The local economic in this study is limited to the activity of shop or waning (smal shop) opening, which is the most dominant activity and is estimated to have and econom...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Theses |
Language: | Indonesia |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/3171 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
Summary: | The purpose of the study are to identify, to analyze and to predict the link between labor of huller and local economic activity. The local economic in this study is limited to the activity of shop or waning (smal shop) opening, which is the most dominant activity and is estimated to have and economic relation with the labor of huller. The method applied in this research is a survey method where the information is gatheredfrom respondents of representative population. The quetionnaries are distributed to respondents, in order to get a clear figure of labor dynamic and behavior. Interview with the informer is used to complete the data collected. And the method of multiplier effect is used to predict the size of economic spreading accepted by local community. Based on its labor, the huller can be differentiated become big huller, middle huller and small huller. The study of labor economic condition indicates that highest monthly average income of the labor, especially lokal workers, is Rp 560.937 for small huller workers, and then Rp 489.732 for big huller workers, and Rp 479.357 for medium huller. The result indicates that the huller industry with big investment has no strong correlation with the high income of its workers. Next, the expenditure pattern study of workers living cost shows that the big huller workers use 52% of their income for meal, 19% to be saved and 29% for others. In the case of middle huller workers, they use 50% t for meal, 21% to be saved, and 29% for others. And then the small huller workers use 43% for meal, 28% to be saved, and 29% for others. This proportion is influenced by their income level, that is the higher income level has a tendency of expenditure for meal relatively smaller. If we assumed that the expenditure percentage of each worker for that meal requirement is stable, then the estimation of economic transaction between huller worker and the shop owner will be Rp 0,53 billion per year (big huller worker), Rp 0,48 billion per year (middle huller workers ) and Rp 0,1 billion / year (worker of small huller). Expenditure percentage of the economic worker yields different values of multiplier effect, where workers of big huller assign effect multiplier value equal to 5,26, that means, if industry of big huller can recruit 15 workers with average wage is Rp 489.732 per month, then the total amount of money flow is Rp 38,4 million per month. Next the workers of middle huller assign effect multiplier value equal to 4,76, that means, if industry of middle huller can recruit 11 workers with average wage is Rp 479.357 per month, then total amount of money flow is Rp to 25,23 million per month. And workers of small huller assign effect multiplier value 3,33, that means, if industry of small huller can recruit 6 workers with average wage is Rp 560.937 per month, then total amount of money flow is Rp to 11,32 million per month. In the fact, consumption pattern which reflected in the behavior of the worker, tends not always expend their consumption requirement at shop or waning located near their place. his situation makes the economic increasing that happens to the shop or warung is relatively smaller then is axpected. This matter is proven by identifying the expenditure of consumption requirement, that is only for meal requirement (not includes other requirement), where the shop or waning owner is estimated to get omset equal to Rp 2.000.000 per month, but in reality he only gets Rp 1.224.688 per month ( 61,23%). This condition was caused by existence of leakages meal expenditure which is accepted by other economic activities like huller and also the market providing more complete requirement. |
---|