Development of Phase-Field Simulations for Study of Sensitisation Kinetics and Dendrite Morphology from Welding Process
There are a lot of studies up until today on sensitisation phenomena and dendrite morphology, but due to the number of parameters to consider and the difficulty to conduct direct observation, there are numerous problems researcher still do not understand about the phenomenon. The computational me...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Final Project |
| Language: | Indonesia |
| Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/33538 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
| Language: | Indonesia |
| Summary: | There are a lot of studies up until today on sensitisation phenomena and dendrite
morphology, but due to the number of parameters to consider and the difficulty
to conduct direct observation, there are numerous problems researcher still do not
understand about the phenomenon. The computational method emerged as one
of the alternatives to surmount the obstacle of studying the phenomena. One of
the method developed for this purpose is phase-field method.
In this research, study on the kinetics and sensitisation of stainless steel and
dendrite growth in filler metal in the case if dissimilar metal welding has been
done. Data for filler material and the stainless steel refers to SS304. The study of
kinetics is done by 1-dimentional approach, while the study of dendrite
morphology is done by 2-dimentional approach. The mathematical equation for
phase-field method is differentiated from Ginzburg-Landau equation following
Allen-Cahn model and phase-field model from literature. The computation is
executed by finite difference method. The computational program writing is done
with FORTRAN90 and so is the compilations. The 1-dimentional simulations is
visualized with Plots32, while the 2-dimentional simulations is visualized with
MicroAVS V.21.
The result shows the phase-field curve as the result of the simulation is quite
steady. However, the space between profiles at the beginning and the end of the
curves was found quite distance, that the phase-field parameter variations are needed. It is found that variations of interface thickness produced the most
significant results among other parameter variations. While in 2-dimentional
observation, it is found that the ?T parameter affects the dendrite growth where
?T=0.5 results to the largest dendrite observed.
|
|---|