GOVERNANCE OF PUBLIC SERVICE OBLIGATIONS IMPLEMENTATION FOR SEA PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION BOUNDED RATIONALITY PERSPECTIVE ( COMPARATIVE STUDY INDONESIA – JAPAN )

• Main Author: Digjaya Muhammad, Gelar
• Format: Theses
• Language: Indonesia
• Online Access: https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/33886
• Institution: Institut Teknologi Bandung

The Indonesian government launched a large-scale agricultural development program (estate), interpreted as an effort to development of food security and energy, and as a response over the turmoil that occurred at the global level, a large-scale corporate food and energy agriculture Merauke Integrated Food and Energy Estate (MIFEE), with cultivated land area of 1.283 million hectares (ha) in the Merauke, Papua province. MIFEE which requires large-scale land acquisitions take place conflictual and collide with the issue of Malind indigenous peoplesrights. This study aims to explore patterns of institutional relations and governance policies that cause the program lasts conflictual MIFEE against Malind indigenous peoples rights issues. This is a qualitative research using library research from various written sources relevant to the issue of research and in-depth interviews to the selected informants of this study using the analytical framework adopted from the Institutional Analysis and Development (IAD). The results of the study indicate shortcomings in the implementation of this major project that impressed political interests without a good process, constrained coordination and support from the central government budget is very limited, lack of infrastructure and human resources. Not seen any strong commitment and focus for implementation in synergy and synchronization between departments and between the central government and the provincial and district. The role of the central government looks just passively limited to the provision of policy and facilitate the needs of investors through incentives in regulation, but tend to release this project goes to the local government. Weak legal framework to protect the indigenous peoplesrights, an opportunity for stakeholders in the neglect of transparency, access to information, bribery and manipulation of land acquisition agreement. Patterns of interaction that has implications for the indigenous peoples rights: information and agreements that are not transparent, low community participation in the negotiation of land deal/release, there is no clear conflict resolution mechanisms, weak monitoring of central and local government, acquisitions boundary are not clear, not disregard the important places, insufficient on land compensation for the loss of indigenous forests and the lure of compensation in the form of plasma schemes and construction of public facilities are not implemented.