EXPERIMENT AND NUMERICAL STUDY ON BLAST LOADING OF GLASS FIBER REINFORCED POLYMER BY USING LOAD BLAST ENHANCED AND SMOOTHED PARTICLE HYDRODYNAMIC METHOD

The composite material structure has been one of breakthrough technology for blast shield protection. It is lighter than steel that using in traditional armour as the strength also compete. This research is conducting numerical model approach to predict the maximum deflection to be compared to exper...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Rafiqi Sitompul, Muhammad
Format: Theses
Language:Indonesia
Online Access:https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/35152
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The composite material structure has been one of breakthrough technology for blast shield protection. It is lighter than steel that using in traditional armour as the strength also compete. This research is conducting numerical model approach to predict the maximum deflection to be compared to experiment result. Glass fibre reinforced polymer is the concern which is used in specimen under blast loading. The composite structure is modelled as shell element using MAT54 simulated in LSDYNA software. The failure criteria applied in composite model is Chang-Chang failure criteria that widely uses for composite damage due to high strain rate problems. The explosive charge TNT is modelled by using two blast simulation method that are load blast enhanced (LBE) which has roots similar to ConWep and smooth particles hydrodynamic (SPH). The ConWep is based on empirical result of blast experiment database due to conventional chemical explosions. SPH model is mesh free model that the system represented as unconnected particle that each oh it has physical property information. The raw materials used for manufacture the specimen is available in local market. Thus, the tensile test is needed to predict the property of material. The result of SPH method shows the closest with experiment data with error about less than 10%, besides LBE method has error about 30% in this problem case.