APPLICATION OF RADON TRANSFORMATION METHODS ON RAYLEIGH WAVE AND INVERSION OF GENETIC ALGORITHM AND DIFFERENTIAL EVOLUTION ALGORITHM FOR ESTIMATION OF SHEAR WAVE VELOCITY PROFILE, CASE STUDY: TANI KOTA
One of the method which use surface wave to determine the S wave velocity of subsurface is active MASW method. This method consists of three stages: acquisition, dispersion curve analysis, and inversion. Dispersion curve extraction stage plays a big role in producing a good Shear wave velocity mo...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Final Project |
| Language: | Indonesia |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/37209 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
| Language: | Indonesia |
| Summary: | One of the method which use surface wave to determine the S wave velocity of
subsurface is active MASW method. This method consists of three stages:
acquisition, dispersion curve analysis, and inversion. Dispersion curve extraction
stage plays a big role in producing a good Shear wave velocity model. Therefore,
in this study the application of Radon transformation method has advantages in
terms of good resolution and the continuation of the dispersion curve trend over a
longer frequency range. These two advantages affect the accuracy and resolution
of a good Shear wave velocity model. Genetic algorithm (GA), Differential
Evolution (DE), and Joint Inversion (GA and DE) techniques are used in inversion
stage. There are three data used, synthetic data and Tani Kota. Synthetic data is
used to determine the accuracy level of dispersion curve extraction algorithm. In
addition, synthetic data is also used at the inversion stage to measure the accuracy
of the inversion method. The results of the synthetic data test at the dispersion curve
extraction stage shows that the radon transformation method can produce good
resolution and a fairly good curve continuity. From the results of dispersion images
and dispersion curves picking at 1m and 3m spaces, the dispersion images have
good resolution, results from inversion of field data, there are three layers and these
results are similar to results of field observationin, first layer (vs =120.8867516m/s
and thickness = 1.085572437m interpreted as soil, layer 2 (vs = 575.4901698m/s)
and (thickness =2.707651195m) interpreted as soft rock / very dense soil, layer 3
(vs=897.6049617m/s) interpreted as sedimentary rocks in the depths of more than
2,7m. This result is similar to the results of observations in the field. |
|---|