SENTIMENT ANALYSIS OF PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES IN 2019 INDONESIAN GENERAL ELECTION USING MACHINE LEARNING
The 2019 Indonesian Presidential General Election – commonly referred to as Pilpres 2019 – is held by KPU (Komisi Pemilihan Umum) to determine Indonesia's president and vice president for 2019-2024. In this election, the registered presidential and vicepresidential candidates were Ir. H. Jok...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Final Project |
Language: | Indonesia |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/38345 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
Summary: | The 2019 Indonesian Presidential General Election – commonly referred to as Pilpres
2019 – is held by KPU (Komisi Pemilihan Umum) to determine Indonesia's president
and vice president for 2019-2024. In this election, the registered presidential and vicepresidential
candidates were Ir. H. Joko Widodo and Prof. Dr. (HC). K. H. Ma'ruf Amin
as number 1 and H. Prabowo Subianto and Sandiaga Salahuddin Uno, M.B.A. as
number 2. By knowing the public sentiment towards the two presidential candidates,
each team can estimate the possibility of winning the candidate who was promoted in
the 2019 Presidential Election and formulate the appropriate campaign strategy.
Sentiment analysis is done using Twitter text data relating to the two presidential candidates
to find out the sentiments of each candidate. Two machine learning models
were built, namely Naïve Bayes Classifier and Support Vector Machine, to classify the
Twitter texts into groups of positive, neutral, and negative sentiments. The quality of
the two models is compared to determine the best model that will be used as a reference
in sentiment analysis. By using the classification results from the best model, sentiment
analysis is conducted to determine the acquisition of positive and negative sentiments
for each candidate. Also seen is the acquisition of positive and negative sentiments of
the two candidates at several different times. At the end of this study, we conclude the
winning of one candidate in obtaining positive sentiments compared to other candidates.
|
---|