STUDY ANALYSIS OF PRECAST PIER PERFORMANCE OF MULTISPAN LRT STRUCTURE USING LEAD RUBBER BEARING WITH NON LINEAR TIME HISTORY ANALYSIS
Currently, conventional reinforced concrete bridge structures are still used as a choice of structural systems. Then it takes longer time on the construction period and the pier as a place for energy dissipation so that the pillar will be damaged, but this system has good ductility. To speed up th...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Theses |
Language: | Indonesia |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/39301 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
Summary: | Currently, conventional reinforced concrete bridge structures are still used as a choice of structural
systems. Then it takes longer time on the construction period and the pier as a place for energy
dissipation so that the pillar will be damaged, but this system has good ductility. To speed up the
construction period, a Precast Segmental Bridge Column (PSBC) system will be reviewed, but this
system has poor ductility, so this configuration is designed as a “strong connection” with the help
of Lead Rubber Bearings as the main energy dissipator. The purpose of this study is to study the
seismic performance of PSBC configuration with LRB, seeking between the pier and LRB, which
are dominant in dissipating earthquakes and pier conditions will be plastic or elastic. By comparing
2 study parameters, namely using LRB and without using LRB. The LRT structure was first
designed in accordance with ACI 343 standards for guideway and earthquake loading using SNI
2833, for base isolation using AASHTO GSID. The concept of design is that pier remains elastic
when the earthquake is 1000 and 50 years, while for LRB it remains elastic at 50 years but may
melt when 1000 years. Then perform a performance analysis with the Non Linear Time History
Analysis, each given 7 pieces of 50 annual earthquakes and 1000 annual earthquakes to be taken
on average. Based on the non-linear analysis, the structure using LRB remained elastic (<IO) while
without using LRB experienced (LS), due to period shifts due to addition of damping from LRB.
|
---|